Sondage d’opinion national pour les primaires présidentielles du Parti démocrate de 2020

Il s’agit d’une liste de sondages d’opinion publique à l’échelle nationale qui ont été menés concernant les primaires démocrates pour l’ élection présidentielle américaine de 2020 . Les personnes citées dans les sondages sont déclarées candidates ou ont fait l’objet de spéculations médiatiques sur leur éventuelle candidature.

Compte tenu du grand nombre de candidats, les scores de certains candidats peu interrogés et peu interrogés ont été regroupés dans la colonne « autre » ; leurs scores exacts peuvent être consultés en consultant les notes de bas de page associées à chaque sondage. Les sondages inclus sont parmi les démocrates ou les démocrates et les indépendants à tendance démocrate, et n’incluent pas les indépendants à tendance républicaine. Les sondages ouverts sont inclus et marqués d’un astérisque (*), mais les versions fermées de ces sondages sont répertoriées dans la mesure du possible. Si plusieurs versions de sondages sont fournies, la version utilisée pour la qualification du débat est prioritaire, puis la version parmi les électeurs probables, puis les électeurs inscrits, puis les adultes.

Arrière-plan

Le Comité national démocrate (DNC) a déterminé que les candidats pouvaient se qualifier pour les deux premiers débats primaires démocrates soit en votant à 1% ou plus dans au moins trois États nationaux ou des premiers États ( Iowa , New Hampshire , Nevada et Caroline du Sud) .) sondages parrainés ou menés par des organisations désignées (dans différentes régions si par la même organisation) publiés après le 1er janvier 2019, jusqu’au 12 juin 2019, ou par un seuil de collecte de fonds nécessitant au moins 65 000 donateurs uniques dont au moins 200 dans 20 pays différents États. Si plus de 20 candidats atteignaient l’un ou l’autre des seuils, les candidats atteignant les deux seuils se verraient accorder la priorité la plus élevée pour entrer dans les débats, suivis de ceux ayant la moyenne de sondage la plus élevée et ceux ayant le plus de donateurs. Les sondeurs et les sponsors des sondages désignés pour examen par le DNC étaient Associated Press , ABC News , CBS News , CNN , The Des Moines Register , Fox News , leLas Vegas Review-Journal , Monmouth University , NBC News , The New York Times , National Public Radio , Quinnipiac University , Reuters , University of New Hampshire , USA Today , The Wall Street Journal , The Washington Post et Winthrop University . ^[1] Les sondages ouverts n’ont pas compté dans le seuil de vote. ^[2] Seuls les résultats des sondages les plus importants ont été pris en compte dans le seuil. ^[3]

Pour les troisième et quatrième débats primaires, les candidats devaient respecter à la fois les seuils de sondage et de collecte de fonds. Les considérations précédentes n’étaient que des sondages entre le 28 juin et le 28 août 2019 et sont passées à 4 sondages de qualification à 2 % de soutien, excluant désormais les sondages parrainés par le Las Vegas Review-Journal et Reuters ; cette dernière exigence a également été augmentée, à 130 000 donneurs uniques avec au moins 400 dans 20 États différents. ^[4]

Stacey Abrams , Michael Avenatti , Sherrod Brown , Hillary Clinton , Mark Cuban , Andrew Cuomo , Al Franken , Eric Garcetti , Eric Holder , Tim Kaine , Jason sont d’autres personnes qui ont été incluses dans les sondages primaires démocrates nationaux mais qui ne se sont pas présentées à l’investiture de 2020 . Kander , Joe Kennedy III , John Kerry , Mitch Landrieu , Terry McAuliffe , Chris Murphy , Gavin Newsom , Michelle Obama, Howard Schultz , Oprah Winfrey et Mark Zuckerberg .

Agrégation des sondages

Le graphique suivant illustre la position de chaque candidat dans les agrégateurs de sondages de décembre 2018 à avril 2020.

Agrégats de sondage

Candidats actifs

Joe Biden

Autres/Indécis

Candidats retirés

Bernie Sanders

Tulsi Gabbard

Elisabeth Warren

Michel Bloomberg

Amy Klobuchar

Pete Buttigieg

Andrew Yang

Cory Booker

Kamala Harris

Beto O’Rourke

Événements

Débats

Caucus et primaires

Déclaration d’ urgence nationale en cas de pandémie de COVID-19

2020

– Débattre du scrutin de qualification désigné par le Comité national démocrate (DNC)

avril–août 2020

Vote d’avril à août 2020

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Bernie Sander	Quelqu’un d’autre	Ne voterait pas	Indécis
20 août	Fin de la convention nationale démocrate
YouGov/Économiste	16 au 18 août 2020	559 (LV)	–	59%	33%	–	–	7%
11 août	Connecticut primaire
YouGov/Économiste	9-11 août 2020	587 (LV)	–	59%	33%	–	–	8%
YouGov/Économiste	Du 2 au 4 août 2020	527 (LV)	–	61%	32%	–	–	7%
YouGov/Économiste	26-28 juillet 2020	576 (LV)	–	60%	33%	–	–	7%
YouGov/Économiste	19-21 juillet 2020	557 (LV)	–	61%	32%	–	–	7%
YouGov/Économiste	12-14 juillet 2020	598 (LV)	–	58%	35%	–	–	8%
12 juillet	Porto Rico primaire
11 juillet	Primaire de la Louisiane
7 juillet	Primaires du Delaware et du New Jersey
YouGov/Économiste	Du 5 au 7 juillet 2020	559 (LV)	–	57%	34%	–	–	dix%
YouGov/Économiste	28-30 juin 2020	605 (LV)	–	59%	34%	–	–	7%
23 juin	Primaires du Kentucky et de New York
YouGov/Économiste	21-23 juin 2020	561 (LV)	–	57%	37%	–	–	6%
YouGov/Économiste	14–16 juin 2020	541 (LV)	–	60%	33%	–	–	7%
9 juin	Primaires de Géorgie et de Virginie-Occidentale
YouGov/Économiste	Du 7 au 9 juin 2020	649 (LV)	–	56%	38%	–	–	7%
6 juin	Caucus de Guam et des îles Vierges américaines
5 juin	Biden obtient la majorité des délégués promis et devient le candidat démocrate présumé
2 juin	District de Columbia , Indiana , Maryland , Montana , Nouveau-Mexique , Pennsylvanie , Rhode Island et Dakota du Sud Primaires démocrates
YouGov/Économiste	31 mai–2 juin	589 (LV)	–	60%	33%	–	–	7%
Examinateur Zogby/EMI/Washington	26 mai [b]	< 1000 (LV) [c]	–	55%	–	37%	–	–
22 mai	Hawaï primaire
19 mai	Oregon primaire
YouGov/Économiste	17-19 mai	581 (LV)	–	62%	33%	–	–	5%
12 mai	Primaire du Nebraska
YouGov/Économiste	10-12 mai	602 (LV)	–	57%	36%	–	–	7%
Rapports Rasmussen	10-11 mai	< 1000 (LV) [d]	–	54%	–	28%	–	18%
YouGov/Économiste	3-5 mai	547 (LV)	–	55%	37%	–	–	7%
Consultation du matin	2-3 mai	737 (VR)	± 4%	61%	–	26 % [e]	–	13%
Le 2 mai	Primaire du Kansas
28 avril	Ohio primaire
Groupe Winston	27-28 avril	~670 (VD) [f]	–	54%	17%	2%	18%	8%
YouGov/Économiste	26-28 avril	563 (LV)	–	59%	32%	–	–	9%
Collège Emerson	26-28 avril	479 (RV)	–	68%	24%	3%	2% [g]	7%
YouGov/Économiste	19-21 avril	544 (LV)	–	60%	34%	–	–	6%
17 avril	Caucus du Wyoming
YouGov/Économiste	12-14 avril	586 (LV)	–	49%	31%	18%	–	2%
10 avril	Alaska primaire
Zogby Analytique	8-9 avril	679 (LV)	± 3,8 %	61%	–	30 % [h]	–	9%
8 avril	Sanders se retire de la course
7 avril	Wisconsin primaire
YouGov/Économiste	5-7 avril	586 (LV)	–	49%	28%	18%	–	5%
CNN/SSRS	3-6 avril	462 (RV)	± 5,6 %	65%	30%	1%	–	5%
Consultation du matin	30 mars au 5 avril	13 346 (LV)	± 1,0 %	61%	36%	3%	–	–
Groupe Winston	1er au 3 avril	~670 (VD) [f]	–	48%	27%	2%	14%	dix%
MICI/TIPP [1]	Du 29 mars au 1er avril	447 (VR)	–	62%	30%	3%	–	5%

Mars 2020

scrutin de mars 2020

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Bernie Sander	Tulsi Gabbard	Quelqu’un d’autre	Ne voterait pas	Indécis
YouGov/Économiste	29-31 mars	573 (LV)	–	47%	34%	–	15%	–	4%
HarrisX/La Colline	29-30 mars	425 (RV)	± 4,7 %	54%	32%	–	5%	–	dix%
Consultation du matin	23 au 29 mars	15 101 (LV)	± 1,0 %	61%	36%	–	3%	–	–
Harvard-Harris	24–26 mars	903 (RV)	–	58%	32%	–	–	1%	9%
ABC/Washington Post	22-25 mars	388 (VR)	± 5,5 %	55%	39%	–	2%	5% [je]	1%
YouGov/Économiste	22-24 mars	545 (LV)	–	47%	34%	–	16%	–	3%
Aperçus d’échelon	20-24 mars	490 (LV)	–	66%	29%	–	–	–	–
Ipsos/Reuters	18–24 mars	1981 (A)	± 2,5 %	53%	34%	2%	2%%	0%	8%
Consultation du matin	16-22 mars	16 180 (LV)	± 1,0 %	60%	36%	–	5%	–	–
19 mars	Gabbard se retire de la course
Collège Emerson	18-19 mars	519 (LV)	± 4,3 %	54%	42%	–	4%	–	–
17 mars	Primaires de l’ Arizona , de la Floride et de l’Illinois
YouGov/Économiste	15-17 mars	551 (LV)	–	48%	32%	–	13%	–	6%
Ipsos/Reuters	13–16 mars	458 (RV)	± 5,2 %	48%	39%	2%	2%	0%	8%
15 mars	Onzième débat primaire démocrate
HarrisX/La Colline	14-15 mars	894 (RV)	± 3,3 %	55%	31%	4%	3%	–	7%
14 mars	Caucus démocrate des îles Mariannes du Nord
Consultation du matin	11-15 mars	8 869 (LV)	± 1,0 %	58%	37%	3%	3%	–
Groupe Winston	11-13 mars	~670 (VD) [f]	–	50%	24%	4%	1%	12%	9%
NBC/WSJ [2]	11-13 mars	438 (LV)	± 4,68 %	61%	32%	4%	–	1%	2%
Université Hofstra	5 au 12 mars	572 (LV)	± 2,9 %	58%	35%	2%	5%	–	–
Consultation du matin	11 mars	2072 (LV)	± 2,0 %	59%	35%	3%	3%	–	–
11 mars	COVID-19 déclaré pandémie par l’ Organisation mondiale de la santé ; urgence nationale déclarée le 13 mars
10 mars	Démocrates à l’étranger , primaires de l’ Idaho , du Michigan , du Mississippi , du Missouri , du Dakota du Nord et de Washington
YouGov/Économiste	8-10 mars	573 (LV)	–	53%	38%	2%	–	1%	6%
Stratégies du chisme	9 mars	840 (LV)	± 3,38 %	50%	42%	4%	–	5%
HarrisX/La Colline	8–9 mars	442 (RV)	± 4,6 %	55%	28%	5%	4%	–	8%
Ipsos/Reuters	6 au 9 mars	420 (VR)	± 5,5 %	54%	33%	2%	3%	0%	8%
Consultation du matin	5 au 8 mars	9593 (LV)	± 1,0 %	56%	38%	3%	3%	–	–
Université Quinnipiac	5 au 8 mars	559 (RV)	± 4,2 %	54%	35%	2%	1%	–	8%
CNN/SSRS	4–7 mars	540 (RV)	± 5%	52%	36%	–	8 % [j]	–	4%
Consultation du matin	5 mars	1390 (LV)	± 3,0 %	54%	38%	2%	6%	–	–
Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Pete Buttigieg	Tulsi Gabbard	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Tom Steyer	Elisabeth Warren	Autres	Ne voterait pas	Indécis
5 mars	Warren se retire de la course
Ipsos/Reuters	4-5 mars	474 (VR)	± 5,1 %	45%	–	–	1%	–	32%	–	11%	4%	0%	7%
4 mars	Bloomberg se retire de la course
3 mars	Super mardi
Consultation du matin	2-3 mars	961 (LV)	± 4,0 %	36%	19%	–	–	–	28%	–	14%	3%	–	–
YouGov/Économiste	1er au 3 mars	722 (LV)	–	28%	11%	7%	2%	4%	24%	–	19%	–	–	–
2 mars	Klobuchar se retire de la course
HarrisX/La Colline	1–2 mars	453 (VR)	± 4,6 %	28%	20%	–	2%	3%	23%	–	11%	2%	–	dix%
Ipsos/Reuters	28 février – 2 mars	469 (VR)	–	15%	14%	dix%	1%	4%	24%	2%	9%	2%	4%	14%
1 mars	Buttigieg se retire de la course
Consultation du matin	1 mars	2656 (LV)	± 2,0 %	26%	17%	dix%	–	3%	29%	1%	11%	–	–	–

Février 2020

scrutin de février 2020

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Pete Buttigieg	Tulsi Gabbard	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Tom Steyer	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autres	Ne voterait pas	Indécis
29 février	Caroline du Sud primaire ; Steyer se retire de la course
MICI/TIPP	20-29 février	325 (RV)	–	20%	13%	7%	– [k]	6%	23%	– [k]	17%	–	–	–	–
Harvard-Harris	26-28 février	925 (RV)	–	20%	18%	dix%	1%	2%	25%	3%	11%	–	1%	2%	7%
Consultation du matin	26-27 février	5334 (LV)	± 1,0 %	21%	17%	dix%	2%	4%	33%	3%	11%	–	–	–	–
Nouvelles YouGov/Yahoo	26-27 février	–	–	21%	14%	dix%	1%	4%	27%	2%	18%	–	–	–	–
Recherche de changement	25 au 27 février	821 (LV)	–	14%	8%	9%	1%	3%	40%	2%	20%	–	–	–	–
SurveyUSA	25-26 février	825 (LV)	± 3,6 %	21%	21%	9%	1%	4%	28%	2%	8%	–	–	–	5%
Fox News	23 au 26 février	1 000 (RV)	± 4,0 %	18%	16%	12%	1%	5%	31%	2%	dix%	–	–	1%	4%
25 février	Dixième débat primaire démocrate
YouGov/Économiste	23-25 ​​février	584 (LV)	–	20%	11%	9%	4%	4%	30%	1%	16%	–	–	1%	4%
Ipsos/Reuters	19 au 25 février	1 808 (RV)	± 2,6 %	17%	16%	11%	1%	4%	29%	3%	12%	–	1%	1%	6%
HarrisX/La Colline	23-24 février	470 (RV)	± 4,5 %	17%	19%	12%	2%	3%	28%	3%	8%	–	– [l]	–	8%
Consultation du matin	23 février	2631 (LV)	± 2,0 %	18%	19%	11%	2%	4%	32%	3%	11%	–	– [l]	–	–
22 février	Caucus du Nevada
Nouvelles de YouGov/CBS	20-22 février	6 498 (LV)	± 1,7 %	17%	13%	dix%	1%	5%	28%	2%	19%	–	5% [mois]	–	– [k]
Université Saint-Léo	17 au 22 février	310 (LV)	–	25%	16%	6%	2%	3%	26%	2%	9%	–	–	–	–
Consultation du matin	20 février	2609 (LV)	± 2,0 %	19%	17%	11%	– [l]	5%	30%	– [l]	12%	–	– [l]	–	–
19 février	Neuvième débat primaire démocrate
YouGov/Économiste	16 au 18 février	555 (LV)	± 3,0 %	18%	12%	11%	2%	7%	24%	2%	16%	–	–	2%	5%
Collège Emerson	16 au 18 février	573 (LV)	± 2,7 %	22%	14%	8%	4%	6%	29%	3%	12%	–	4%	–	– [k]
ABC/poste de lavage	14-17 février	408 (RV)	± 3,5 %	16%	14%	8%	1%	7%	32%	2%	12%	–	– [k]	–	– [k]
NBC/WSJ	14-17 février	426 (LV)	± 4,8 %	15%	14%	13%	1 % [n]	7%	27%	2 % [n]	14%	–	– [k]	–	– [k]
Ipsos/Reuters	14-17 février	543 (RV)	± 5,0 %	13%	17%	11%	– [k]	5%	25%	– [k]	9%	–	– [k]	–	– [k]
SurveyUSA	13 au 17 février	1022 (LV)	± 3,3 %	18%	18%	12%	– [o]	4%	29%	2%	dix%	–	1 % [p]	–	6%
Consultation du matin	12 au 17 février	15 974 (LV)	± 1,0 %	19%	20%	12%	2%	6%	28%	3%	dix%	–	1%	–	–
Groupe Winston	15-16 février	~670 (VD) [f]	–	13%	16%	9%	2%	6%	23%	3%	9%	–	1 % [q]	9%	dix%
NPR/PBS NewsHour/Mariste	13 au 16 février	1164 (VR)	± 3,7 %	15%	19%	8%	0%	9%	31%	2%	12%	–	0%	–	5%
HarrisX/La Colline	14-15 février	449 (RV)	± 4,6 %	19%	18%	dix%	0%	6%	22%	3%	12%	–	–	–	8%
Zogby Analytique	13-14 février	732 (LV)	± 3,6 %	18%	20%	9%	3%	5%	24%	4%	dix%	–	2 % [r]	–	6%
Politique YouGov/GW	3-14 février	437 (RV) [b]	–	21,5 %	9,4 %	10,5 %	1,4 %	3,1 %	20,3 %	1,1 %	14,9 %	4,1 %	1,1 % [s]	3,5 %	8,9 %
Consultation du matin	12 février	2639 (LV)	± 2%	19%	18%	11%	– [l]	5%	29%	– [l]	dix%	–	– [l]	–	–
11 février	primaire du New Hampshire ; Yang se retire de la course
YouGov/Économiste	9 au 11 février	552 (LV)	–	18%	12%	dix%	4%	7%	22%	1%	15%	2%	–	1%	6%
McLaughlin & Associés	7 au 11 février	479 (LV)	–	24%	16%	11%	1%	3%	21%	3%	11%	3%	1 % [t]	–	7%
HarrisX/La Colline	7 au 10 février	913 (RV)	± 3,2 %	23%	16%	9%	1%	3%	20%	3%	9%	3%	3 % [u]	–	11%
Ipsos/Reuters	6 au 10 février	556 (RV)	± 3,6 %	17%	15%	8%	1%	3%	20%	2%	11%	5%	2 % [v]	3%	14%
Université de Monmouth	6 au 9 février	357 (VR)	± 5,2 %	16%	11%	13%	1%	6%	26%	1%	13%	4%	0%	2%	5%
Université Quinnipiac	5 au 9 février	665 (RV)	± 3,8 %	17%	15%	dix%	1%	4%	25%	1%	14%	2%	1%	1%	dix%
Consultation du matin	4 au 9 février	15 348 (LV)	± 1%	22%	17%	11%	1%	3%	25%	3%	11%	4%	2 % [w]	–	–
7 février	Huitième débat primaire démocrate
Consultation du matin	5 février	2 500 (LV)	± 2,0 %	24%	15%	12%	– [l]	3%	25%	3%	11%	5%	– [l]	–	–
Consultation du matin [3]	4-5 février	891 (LV)	± 3%	25%	14%	dix%	2%	3%	22%	3%	13%	4%	1 % [x]	–	4%
Consultation du matin	4 février	2 500 (LV)	± 2,0 %	27%	16%	9%	– [l]	3%	24%	3%	11%	5%	– [l]	–	–
YouGov/Économiste	2 au 4 février	616 (LV)	–	24%	9%	9%	3%	6%	19%	2%	18%	3%	1 % [x]	1%	6%
Consultation du matin	3 février	2 500 (LV)	± 2,0 %	29%	16%	7%	– [l]	3%	22%	2%	13%	5%	– [l]	–	–
3 février	Caucus de l’Iowa
Ipsos/Reuters	31 janvier – 3 février	551 (RV)	–	22%	9%	5%	1%	4%	19%	3%	dix%	4%	2 % [w]	4%	17%
Groupe Winston	31 janvier – 2 février	~670 (VD) [f]	–	20%	13%	5%	2%	3%	17%	2%	8%	5%	4 % [a]	9%	9%
Atlas Intel	30 janvier – 2 février	532 (LV)	± 4,0 %	24%	8%	5%	3%	2%	28%	– [z]	11%	3%	– [z]	–	12%
Consultation du matin	27 janvier – 2 février	15 259 (LV)	± 1%	28%	14%	6%	2%	3%	24%	3%	14%	4%	3 % [u]	–	–

Janvier 2020

scrutin de janvier 2020

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Pete Buttigieg	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Tom Steyer	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
Ipsos/Reuters	29-30 janvier	565 (RV)	± 5,0 %	23%	12%	4%	2%	18%	4%	dix%	4%	1% [aa]	– [l]
MICI/TIPP	23 au 30 janvier	336 (RV)	–	26%	8%	7%	3%	19%	2%	13%	4%	7 % [ab]	11%
Harvard-Harris	27–29 janvier	980 (VR)	–	31%	13%	6%	3%	20%	2%	12%	3%	6 % [ac]	7%
NBC/WSJ [4]	26-29 janvier	428 (LV)	± 4,74 %	26%	9%	7%	5%	27%	2%	15%	4%	3 % [annonce]	2%
YouGov/Économiste	26-28 janvier	591 (LV)	–	26%	4%	7%	4%	24%	1%	20%	4%	5 % [ea]	4%
USC Dornlife/LA Times [5]	15 au 28 janvier	2227 (LV)	± 2%	34%	9%	9%	3%	18%	2 % [af]	16%	2%	3 % [ag] [b]	3%
Université Quinnipiac	22–27 janvier	827 (VR)	± 3,4 %	26%	8%	6%	7%	21%	2%	15%	3%	2% [ah]	11%
YouGov Blue/Données pour le progrès [A]	18–27 janvier	1619 (LV)	± 2,6 %	30%	5%	8%	4%	21%	2%	23%	4%	2 % [ma]	–
Consultation du matin	20-26 janvier	17 836 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	12%	7%	3%	23%	3%	14%	5%	4% [aj]	–
YouGov Blue/Données pour le progrès [A]	18–26 janvier	1619 (LV)	± 2,6 %	42 % [alias]	–	–	–	23%	–	30%	–	–	–
Ipsos/Reuters	22–23 janvier	545 (VR)	± 5,0 %	24%	dix%	7%	3%	20%	2 % [b]	12%	3 % [b]	1% [al] [b]	– [l]
Collège Emerson	21-23 janvier	497 (LV)	± 4,1 %	30%	7%	6%	4%	27%	1%	13%	8%	4 % [du matin]	–
Aperçus d’échelon	20-23 janvier	474 (LV)	–	26%	13%	7%	3%	23%	2%	dix%	3%	3% [un]	dix%
Washington Post/ABC Nouvelles	20-23 janvier	276 (LV) [ao]	–	34%	7%	4%	4%	22%	1%	14%	6%	6 % [ap]	3%
Groupe Winston	21-22 janvier	~670 (VD) [f]	–	20%	9%	6%	4%	16%	3%	9%	5%	18 % [aq]	11%
HarrisX/La Colline	20-22 janvier	878 (RV)	±3,3 %	29%	11%	5%	2%	17%	4%	9%	4%	8% [ar]	11%
Fox News	19–22 janvier	495 (LV)	± 4,0 %	26%	dix%	7%	3%	23%	3%	14%	5%	2% [comme]	5%
YouGov/Économiste	19-21 janvier	470 (RV)	–	28%	6%	8%	4%	18%	2%	21%	3%	4 % [à]	5%
Université de Monmouth	16-20 janvier	372 (LV)	± 5,1 %	30%	9%	6%	5%	23%	1%	14%	3%	3% [au]	6%
CNN/SSRS	16–19 janvier	500 (RV)	± 5,3 %	24%	5%	11%	4%	27%	2%	14%	4%	3 % [moy.]	5%
Consultation du matin	15–19 janvier	12 402 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	dix%	8%	3%	24%	3%	15%	4%	5 % [aw]	–
Centre de recherche Pew *	6 au 19 janvier	5 861 (RV)	±1,9 %	26%	5%	7%	2%	21%	1%	16%	3%	13% [hache]	5 % [ay]
Zogby Analytique	15-16 janvier	438 (LV)	–	24%	11%	8%	4%	24%	3%	11%	6%	4 % [az]	6%
Ipsos/Reuters	15-16 janvier	428 (RV)	± 5,4 %	23%	11%	7%	2%	22%	1%	14%	3%	3 % [ba]	13%
SurveyUSA	14-16 janvier	1086 (LV)	± 3,6 %	32%	9%	9%	2%	21%	3%	14%	4%	3 % [bb]	3%
14 janvier	Septième débat primaire démocrate
HarrisX/La Colline	13-14 janvier	451 (VR)	± 4,6 %	29%	7%	4%	3%	19%	3%	11%	2%	5 % [avant JC]	15%
YouGov/Économiste	11-14 janvier	521 (LV)	–	27%	5%	7%	3%	20%	1%	19%	3%	4 % [bd]	6%
13 janvier	Booker se retire de la course
Université Quinnipiac	8-12 janvier	651 (RV)	± 3,8 %	25%	6%	8%	4%	19%	1%	16%	5%	5% [être]	11%
Consultation du matin	6 au 12 janvier	17 096 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	8%	8%	3%	23%	4%	14%	5%	7% [cf]	–
MICI/TIPP	3-11 janvier	333 (RV)	–	26%	7%	9%	3%	15%	2%	20%	3%	7% [bg]	9%
Ipsos/Reuters	8–9 janvier	436 (RV)	± 5,4 %	23%	8%	7%	1%	20%	3%	15%	3%	6 % [bh]	13%
YouGov/Économiste	5–7 janvier	574 (LV)	–	27%	3%	7%	3%	20%	2%	22%	3%	6 % [bi]	5%
Consultation du matin	30 décembre 2019 – 5 janvier 2020	17 213 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	7%	8%	3%	23%	4%	14%	4%	8% [bj]	–

2019

– Débattre du scrutin de qualification désigné par le Comité national démocrate (DNC)

Décembre 2019

Sondage de décembre 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Tulsi Gabbard	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Tom Steyer	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
YouGov/Économiste	28 au 31 décembre	548 (LV)	–	29%	3%	2%	8%	3%	4%	19%	2%	18%	3%	3 % [nb]	6%
Groupe Winston	28-30 décembre	~670 (VD) [f]	–	28%	7%	3%	5%	1%	3%	11%	2%	9%	3%	14% [bl]	13%
Harvard-Harris	27–29 décembre	780 (RV)	–	30%	7%	2%	7%	1%	2%	17%	2%	12%	3%	7 % [mb]	dix%
Consultation du matin	23 au 29 décembre	17 787 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	6%	3%	8%	1%	3%	21%	3%	14%	4%	5 % [milliards]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	27-28 décembre	431 (VR)	± 4,7 %	28%	11%	2%	6%	2%	2%	16%	2%	11%	2%	4 % [bo]	12%
YouGov/Économiste	22–24 décembre	586 (LV)	–	30%	4%	2%	7%	2%	5%	17%	1%	19%	3%	5 % [pb]	5%
Centre Taubmann	19 au 23 décembre	412 (LV)	–	34%	4%	3%	7%	4%	2%	19%	–	20%	4%	4 % [bq]	–
Consultation du matin	20–22 décembre	7178 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	6%	3%	9%	2%	3%	21%	3%	15%	5%	5 % [fr]	–
19 décembre	Sixième débat primaire démocrate
Ipsos/Reuters	18-19 décembre	709 (A)	–	18%	5%	1%	4%	2%	1%	15%	2%	dix%	2%	8 % [base]	29%
McLaughlin & Associés	14-18 décembre	480 (LV)	–	27%	5%	3%	5%	2%	2%	17%	4%	15%	5%	5% [bt]	11%
Collège Emerson	15-17 décembre	525 (LV)	± 4,2 %	32%	3%	2%	8%	4%	2%	25%	2%	12%	6%	2 % [md]	–
NBC/WSJ	14-17 décembre	410 (LV)	± 4,84 %	28%	4%	2%	9%	2%	5%	21%	1%	18%	3%	2% [bv]	5%
YouGov/Économiste	14-17 décembre	555 (LV)	–	29%	4%	2%	7%	3%	4%	19%	2%	17%	3%	6 % [pc]	4%
CNN/SSRS	12–15 décembre	408 (RV)	± 5,8 %	26%	5%	3%	8%	1%	3%	20%	1%	16%	3%	6 % [boîte]	8%
Université Quinnipiac	11-15 décembre	567 (VR)	± 4,1 %	30%	7%	2%	9%	1%	3%	16%	1%	17%	3%	1% [par]	dix%
Consultation du matin	9 au 15 décembre	13 384 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	7%	3%	8%	2%	2%	22%	3%	15%	4%	5 % [fr]	–
HarrisX/La Colline	13-14 décembre	456 (VR)	± 4,6 %	29%	5%	2%	5%	1%	3%	13%	3%	13%	3%	9 % [bz]	13%
Université de Suffolk/USA Today	10-14 décembre	384 (LV)	–	23%	6%	3%	8%	1%	3%	14%	1%	13%	2%	1 % [env.]	25%
Aperçus d’échelon	9 au 14 décembre	447 (LV)	–	37%	6%	1%	6%	1%	2%	14%	1%	14%	2%	3% [cb]	13%
MICI/TIPP	5 au 14 décembre	312 (RV)	–	26%	5%	3%	9%	1%	2%	18%	2%	14%	2%	10 % [cc]	dix%
Ipsos/Reuters	11-12 décembre	593 (VR)	–	21%	7%	– [cd]	5%	1%	2%	18%	3%	11%	3%	6% [ce]	18%
NPR/PBS NewsHour/Mariste	9 au 11 décembre	704 (VR)	± 5,4 %	24%	4%	4%	13%	1%	4%	22%	<1 %	17%	5%	2% [cf]	5%
Fox News	8-11 décembre	1 000 (RV)	± 4,5 %	30%	5%	2%	7%	3%	5%	20%	1%	13%	3%	5 % [cg]	7%
YouGov/Économiste	7 au 10 décembre	497 (LV)	–	26%	4%	3%	11%	3%	2%	16%	1%	21%	3%	4 % [ch]	6%
Université Quinnipiac	4 au 9 décembre	665 (RV)	± 3,8 %	29%	5%	1%	9%	2%	3%	17%	1%	15%	4%	5% [ci]	11%
Zogby Analytique	5 au 8 décembre	443 (LV)	± 4,7 %	30%	8%	–	7%	3%	2%	20%	3%	16%	4%	3% [cj]	6%
Université de Monmouth	4 au 8 décembre	384 (VR)	± 5%	26%	5%	2%	8%	<1 %	4%	21%	1%	17%	3%	5 % [ck]	11%
Consultation du matin	2 au 8 décembre	15 442 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	6%	3%	9%	2%	2%	22%	3%	16%	4%	5% [cl]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	4-5 décembre	596 (A)	–	19%	4%	1%	6%	0%	1%	14%	1%	9%	3%	5% [cm]	31%
3 décembre	Harris se retire de la course
YouGov/Économiste	1er au 3 décembre	541 (LV)	–	27%	3%	3%	12%	2%	3%	13%	0%	18%	2%	8 % [cn]	7%
La Colline/HarrisX	30 novembre – 1er décembre	437 (RV)	–	31%	6%	1%	9%	0%	2%	15%	2%	dix%	2%	8 % [co]	13%
David Binder Recherche	25 novembre – 1er décembre	1200 (LV)	± 2,8 %	29%	8%	2%	dix%	2%	2%	15%	2%	14%	2%	8 % [pc]	7%
Consultation du matin	25 novembre – 1er décembre	15 773 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	5%	2%	9%	2%	2%	20%	2%	15%	4%	11% [qc]	–

novembre 2019

Sondage de novembre 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
Harvard-Harris	27-29 novembre	756 (VR)	–	29%	7%	8%	5%	2%	16%	13%	3%	10 % [tc]	8%
YouGov/Économiste	24-26 novembre	550 (LV)	–	23%	3%	12%	4%	3%	15%	17%	3%	10 % [cs]	8%
Université Quinnipiac	21 au 25 novembre	574 (RV)	± 4,9 %	24%	3%	16%	3%	3%	13%	14%	2%	8 % [ct]	11%
24 novembre	Bloomberg annonce sa candidature
CNN/SSRS	21 au 24 novembre	431 (VR)	–	28%	3%	11%	3%	2%	17%	14%	3%	7 % [cu]	8%
– [CV]	35%	–	17%	–	–	23%	20%	–	3 % [cw]	2%
Consultation du matin	21 au 24 novembre	8102 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	2%	9%	5%	2%	21%	15%	4%	13 % [cx]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	21-22 novembre	698 (A)	± 5,0 %	21%	–	7%	2%	2%	17%	11%	5%	8 % [cy]	20%
SurveyUSA	20-21 novembre	1088 (LV)	± 3,6 %	30%	3%	11%	5%	2%	17%	15%	4%	9% [cz]	4%
32%	–	12%	5%	2%	17%	16%	4%	9 % [jour]	4%
Recherche d’opinion RealClear	15 au 21 novembre	987 (LV)	–	30%	2%	6%	4%	1%	23%	12%	4%	9 % [db]	7%
20 novembre	Cinquième débat primaire démocrate
Collège Emerson	17-20 novembre	468 (LV)	± 4,5 %	27%	1%	7%	3%	1%	27%	20%	4%	10 % [cc]	–
Recherche sur le changement/Science électorale	16-20 novembre	1142 (LV)	± 2,9 %	22%	1%	14%	4%	2%	23%	23%	4%	7 % [jj]	0%
YouGov/Économiste	17-19 novembre	586 (LV)	–	30%	–	9%	4%	2%	12%	22%	2%	7% [de]	7%
Balanceable	16-18 novembre	1787 (LV)	± 2,0 %	30%	–	7%	5%	2%	17%	18%	4%	9 % [dl]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	16-17 novembre	449 (RV)	± 4,6 %	30%	3%	7%	4%	1%	18%	15%	2%	9 % [dg]	dix%
Consultation du matin	11 au 17 novembre	17 050 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	3%	8%	5%	2%	20%	17%	3%	11% [dh]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	12-14 novembre	685 (A)	–	19%	3%	6%	3%	1%	19%	13%	2%	15% [di]	18%
702 (A)	–	23%	–	6%	5%	1%	18%	11%	2%	9% [j]	21%
YouGov/Économiste	10-12 novembre	600 (LV)	–	23%	–	9%	5%	2%	17%	26%	4%	8 % [nsp]	4%
Consultation du matin	4 au 10 novembre	16 400 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	2%	8%	5%	2%	20%	19%	3%	12 % [dl]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	6-7 novembre	538 (VR)	–	20%	–	5%	– [dm]	1%	16%	13%	3%	11 % [dn]	23%
YouGov/Économiste	3 au 5 novembre	579 (LV)	–	26%	–	8%	6%	2%	14%	25%	1%	12% [faire]	6%
Ipsos/Reuters	1er au 4 novembre	686 (A)	–	22%	–	6%	4%	0%	15%	11%	2%	7 % [dp]	25%
Changer la recherche/Médias tordus	31 octobre – 3 novembre	456 (LV)	–	17%	–	14%	4%	2%	17%	21%	4%	6 % [dq]	14%
Université de Monmouth	30 octobre – 3 novembre	345 (RV)	± 5,3 %	23%	–	9%	5%	2%	20%	23%	3%	6 % [dr]	7%
Consultation du matin	28 octobre – 3 novembre	16 071 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	–	7%	5%	2%	20%	20%	3%	12 % [ds]	–
USC Dornsife / Los Angeles Times	21 octobre – 3 novembre	2599 (LV)	± 2,0 %	28%	–	6%	4%	2%	13%	16%	2%	6% [dt]	21%
La Colline/HarrisX	1er au 2 novembre	429 (RV)	± 4,7 %	26%	–	6%	6%	3%	14%	15%	1%	11 % [du]	16%
1er novembre	O’Rourke se retire de la course

Octobre 2019

Sondage d’octobre 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Tulsi Gabbard	Kamala Harris	Amy Klobuchar	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
Harvard-Harris	29-31 octobre	640 (RV) [dv]	–	33%	3%	4%	0%	5%	3%	2%	18%	15%	2%	5 % [ps]	8%
Université Hofstra / YouGov [6]	25 au 31 octobre	541 (LV)	–	28%	3%	8%	2%	5%	2%	1%	12%	27%	2%	3 % [dx]	8%
MICI/TIPP [7]	24 au 31 octobre	361 (RV)	–	29%	1%	7%	0%	2%	3%	1%	13%	23%	3%	4 % [j]	13%
Fox News	27 au 30 octobre	471 (LV)	± 4,5 %	31%	2%	7%	2%	3%	2%	2%	19%	21%	3%	2 % [dz]	4%
–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	38 % [ea]	62%
Nouvelles NBC/Wall Street Journal	27 au 30 octobre	414 (LV)	± 4,8 %	27%	2%	6%	2%	4%	5%	1%	19%	23%	3%	3 % [eb]	5%
ABC Nouvelles/Washington Post	27 au 30 octobre	452 (A)	± 5,5 %	27%	2%	7%	2%	2%	1%	1%	19%	21%	2%	9–10 % [ce]	6%
YouGov/Économiste	27-29 octobre	630 (LV)	–	27%	1%	8%	2%	4%	2%	4%	14%	23%	3%	6% [ndlr]	7%
Balanceable	26-27 octobre	2172 (LV)	± 2,0 %	29%	3%	6%	2%	4%	2%	3%	17%	19%	3%	8 % [ee]	–
Consultation du matin	21 au 27 octobre	16 186 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	2%	7%	2%	6%	2%	2%	20%	20%	3%	7 % [ef]	–
Université de Suffolk / États-Unis aujourd’hui [8]	23 au 26 octobre	399 (LV)	± 4,9 %	26%	2%	dix%	4%	3%	2%	0%	13%	17%	3%	4% [par exemple]	18%
Aperçus d’échelon	21 au 25 octobre	449 (RV)	–	32%	2%	6%	1%	5%	2%	1%	15%	22%	1%	3% [hein]	11%
La Colline/HarrisX	21-22 octobre	1 001 (VR)	± 3,1 %	27%	1%	6%	0%	5%	1%	3%	14%	19%	2%	7 % [ei]	13%
YouGov/Économiste	20 au 22 octobre	628 (LV)	–	24%	2%	8%	3%	5%	1%	2%	15%	21%	3%	5% [ej]	6%
McLaughlin & Associés	17 au 22 octobre	468 (LV)	–	28%	3%	3%	2%	6%	2%	3%	18%	16%	6%	5 % [ek]	15%
Groupe Winston	18 au 21 octobre	~670 (VD) [f]	–	27%	1%	5%	2%	3%	1%	2%	dix%	17%	3%	15 % [el]	13%
Collège Emerson	18 au 21 octobre	430 (VR)	± 4,7 %	27%	3%	6%	3%	5%	1%	2%	25%	21%	4%	3 % [em]	–
Université Quinnipiac	17 au 21 octobre	713 (VR)	± 4,6 %	21%	1%	dix%	1%	5%	3%	1%	15%	28%	1%	3% [fr]	9%
CNN/SSRS	17 au 20 octobre	424 (VR)	± 5,8 %	34%	1%	6%	1%	6%	3%	3%	16%	19%	2%	3 % [eo]	6%
Consultation du matin	16 au 20 octobre	11 521 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	3%	6%	1%	6%	2%	3%	18%	21%	3%	8 % [ef]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	17-18 octobre	566 (RV)	–	24%	1%	5%	2%	4%	1%	3%	15%	17%	2%	9 % [ep]	16%
HarrisX	11 au 18 octobre	1839 (LV)	± 2,3 %	34%	2%	4%	1%	5%	2%	3%	16%	18%	2%	4% [éq.]	dix%
Consultation du matin	16 octobre	2202 (LV)	± 2,0 %	31%	2%	6%	1%	7%	2%	2%	18%	21%	3%	9 % [heu]	–
SurveyUSA	15-16 octobre	1017 (LV)	± 3,7 %	32%	2%	5%	1%	7%	2%	2%	17%	22%	2%	2% [es]	4%
15 octobre	Quatrième débat primaire démocrate
YouGov/Économiste	13 au 15 octobre	623 (LV)	–	25%	2%	6%	2%	5%	2%	2%	13%	28%	2%	3% [et]	6%
Université Quinnipiac	11-13 octobre	505 (VR)	± 5,3 %	27%	2%	8%	<0,5 %	4%	2%	2%	11%	30%	2%	4% [ue]	8%
Institut de recherche sur la religion publique	10 au 13 octobre	436 (RV)	–	25%	3%	4%	1%	7%	1%	1%	17%	16%	3%	3% [ev]	19%
Consultation du matin	7 au 13 octobre	15 683 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	2%	5%	1%	6%	1%	3%	19%	21%	3%	9 % [ew]	–
Sondage national YouGov/Taubman	10-11 octobre	468 (LV)	–	25%	1%	6%	5%	4%	1%	3%	13%	23%	11%	8 % [exemple]	–
HarrisX	4 au 11 octobre	1841 (LV)	± 2,3 %	35%	2%	5%	1%	6%	1%	3%	15%	18%	2%	4 % [ey]	8%
Balanceable	7-8 octobre	2077 (LV)	± 2,0 %	33%	3%	4%	1%	5%	2%	3%	16%	21%	3%	5 % [ez]	–
Fox News	6 au 8 octobre	484 (LV)	± 4,5 %	32%	2%	4%	1%	5%	2%	3%	17%	22%	2%	5 % [fa]	4%
YouGov/Économiste	6 au 8 octobre	598 (LV)	–	25%	1%	5%	1%	5%	2%	1%	13%	28%	3%	6% [fb]	8%
La Colline/HarrisX	6 et 7 octobre	446 (RV)	± 4,6 %	31%	1%	4%	1%	6%	2%	4%	17%	15%	2%	6 % [fc]	12%
Université Quinnipiac	4 au 7 octobre	646 (VR)	± 4,7 %	26%	2%	4%	0%	3%	2%	1%	16%	29%	3%	3 % [fd]	8%
Consultation du matin	30 septembre – 6 octobre	16 529 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	2%	5%	1%	6%	1%	3%	19%	21%	3%	9 % [ew]	–
Stratégie avalanche/Civiqs	1er au 4 octobre	1043 (LV)	– [fe]	27%	– [fe]	7%	– [fe]	6%	– [fe]	– [fe]	12%	29%	– [fe]	– [fe]	– [fe]
Recherche Raycroft	1er au 4 octobre	7 402 (LV)	–	18%	2%	4%	–	3%	1%	6%	17%	26%	6%	17 % [ff]	–
HarrisX	27 septembre – 4 octobre	1 815 (LV)	± 2,3 %	35%	2%	4%	1%	6%	1%	2%	13%	19%	2%	5% [fg]	9%
YouGov Blue/ Des données pour le progrès [B]	23 septembre – 4 octobre	1276 (LV)	–	23%	2%	6%	1%	5%	1%	2%	15%	36%	3%	1 % [fh]	–
MICI/TIPP	26 septembre – 3 octobre	341 (RV)	–	26%	0%	7%	1%	3%	1%	2%	dix%	27%	3%	2 % [fi]	16%
Groupe Winston	30 septembre – 2 octobre	~670 (VD) [f]	–	29%	1%	4%	1%	4%	1%	2%	12%	11%	1%	23 % [fj]	dix%
YouGov/Économiste	28 septembre – 1er octobre	602 (LV)	–	22%	2%	7%	2%	5%	1%	3%	14%	26%	3%	4 % [fc]	8%

Septembre 2019

Sondage de septembre 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
GW Politics / YouGov	26 au 30 septembre	582 (LV)	–	18%	1%	5%	5%	1%	21%	28%	3%	12 % [fl]	8%
Ipsos/Reuters	26 au 30 septembre	1136 (VR)	–	21%	1%	4%	4%	2%	16%	15%	3%	4 % [fm]	22%
Consultation du matin	23–29 septembre	16 274 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	3%	5%	6%	3%	19%	21%	3%	11 % [fn]	–
Université de Monmouth	23–29 septembre	434 (VR)	± 4,7 %	25%	1%	5%	5%	1%	15%	28%	2%	5 % [pour]	dix%
HarrisX [note 1]	20–27 sept.	2 780 (LV)	± 2,3 %	30%	2%	4%	5%	3%	16%	16%	2%	11 % [fp]	13%
Balanceable	25-26 septembre	3 491 (LV)	± 2,0 %	33%	2%	5%	6%	3%	16%	20%	2%	5 % [fq]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	23–24 septembre	495 (VR)	–	22%	1%	4%	4%	1%	14%	17%	1%	8% [en]	22%
Harvard-Harris	22–24 septembre	693 (RV)	–	28%	2%	3%	6%	3%	16%	17%	3%	7 % [fs]	9%
YouGov/Économiste	22–24 septembre	608 (LV)	–	25%	0%	7%	6%	2%	16%	25%	2%	7 % [pi]	dix%
Collège Emerson	21–23 septembre	462 (RV)	± 4,6 %	25%	2%	6%	4%	1%	22%	23%	8%	8% [fu]	–
Université Quinnipiac	19–23 sept.	561 (VR)	± 4,9 %	25%	0%	7%	3%	2%	16%	27%	2%	6 % [vv]	13%
David Binder Recherche	19 au 22 septembre	1200 (LV)	± 2,8 %	34%	3%	5%	7%	3%	15%	17%	2%	9% [fw]	5%
Consultation du matin	16 au 22 septembre	17 377 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	3%	5%	6%	3%	19%	20%	3%	12 % [effet]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	20–21 sept.	440 (RV)	± 4,7 %	31%	2%	5%	5%	4%	16%	14%	2%	12 % [année]	11%
Ipsos/Reuters	16 au 20 septembre	2692 (A)	–	19%	2%	3%	4%	3%	17%	12%	3%	13 % [fz]	23%
HarrisX	13–20 septembre	1 831 (RV)	± 2,3 %	32%	3%	5%	6%	3%	15%	17%	2%	8 % [ga]	9%
Balanceable	16-18 sept.	3140 (LV)	± 2,0 %	33%	2%	6%	8%	3%	18%	16%	2%	5 % [Go]	–
Zogby Analytique	16-17 sept.	601 (LV)	± 4,0 %	31%	4%	6%	5%	3%	17%	17%	2%	7% [gc]	6%
Fox News	15–17 sept.	480 (LV)	± 4,5 %	29%	3%	5%	7%	4%	18%	16%	2%	5% [gd]	8%
YouGov/Économiste	14–17 sept.	603 (LV)	–	25%	2%	8%	5%	3%	15%	19%	3%	8 % [ge]	8%
Nouvelles NBC / Wall Street Journal	13–16 septembre	506 (LV)	± 4,4 %	31%	2%	7%	5%	1%	14%	25%	4%	8% [gf]	2%
SurveyUSA	13–16 septembre	1017 (LV)	± 3,4 %	33%	4%	5%	6%	4%	17%	19%	3%	3 % [gg]	6%
Civils	13–16 septembre	1291 (LV)	± 3,1 %	24%	1%	7%	6%	2%	14%	30%	2%	6 % [gh]	7%
Consultation du matin	13–15 septembre	7 487 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	3%	5%	6%	4%	20%	18%	3%	10 % [gi]	–
Centre de recherche Pew *	3 au 15 septembre	4 655 (VR)	–	27%	1%	5%	6%	2%	15%	22%	2%	15 % [gj]	5 % [ay]
HarrisX [note 1]	6 au 13 septembre	2808 (LV)	± 2,3 %	31%	2%	4%	6%	3%	16%	12%	3%	12 % [gk]	11%
12 sept.	Troisième débat primaire démocrate
Civils	10-12 septembre	1784 (LV)	–	23%	1%	7%	7%	2%	15%	28%	2%	6 % [gl]	7%
Corps de la démocratie	7–11 sept.	241 (LV)	–	30%	4%	4%	4%	1%	21%	19%	2%	8 % [g]	5%
Ipsos/Reuters	9–10 septembre	557 (RV)	–	22%	3%	4%	4%	2%	16%	11%	3%	7% [gn]	20%
YouGov/Économiste	8–10 septembre	632 (LV)	–	24%	2%	5%	6%	1%	17%	24%	2%	11% [aller]	dix%
McLaughlin & Associés	7–10 sept.	454 (LV)	–	28%	4%	6%	6%	3%	21%	12%	2%	11% [po]	9%
CNN/SSRS	5 au 9 septembre	908 (RV)	± 4,3 %	24%	2%	6%	8%	5%	17%	18%	2%	10 % [q]	6%
La Colline/HarrisX	7–8 septembre	454 (RV)	± 3,1 %	27%	3%	4%	7%	3%	15%	11%	5%	10% [gr]	15%
Consultation du matin	2–8 septembre	17 824 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	3%	5%	7%	3%	21%	16%	3%	9 % [g]	–
Los Angeles Times/USC	12 août – 8 septembre	2 462 (LV)	± 2,0 %	28%	2%	4%	8%	3%	13%	11%	2%	4 % [gt]	24%
YouGov/FairVote [9]	2–6 septembre	1002 (LV)	–	27%	2%	6%	8%	3%	16%	24%	2%	11 % [gu]	–
HarrisX [note 1]	30 août – 6 septembre	2 878 (LV)	–	30%	2%	5%	7%	3%	18%	13%	2%	10 % [gv]	12%
ABC Nouvelles/ Washington Post	2–5 septembre	437 (A)	± 5,5 %	27%	1%	4%	7%	3%	19%	17%	3%	4% [gw]	6%
YouGov/Économiste	1–3 septembre	518 (LV)	–	26%	1%	6%	5%	1%	14%	21%	3%	12 % [gx]	12%
Groupe Winston	31 août – 1er septembre	~670 (VD) [f]	–	30%	2%	4%	5%	2%	12%	11%	2%	19 % [gy]	13%
Consultation du matin	26 août – 1er septembre	16 736 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	3%	5%	8%	3%	20%	16%	3%	10 % [gz]	–

Août 2019

Sondage d’août 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Andrew Yang	Autre	Indécis
HarrisX	23 au 30 août	3 114 (VR)	–	31%	3%	3%	6%	3%	15%	11%	2%	12% [ha]	12%
MICI/TIPP	22 au 30 août	360 (RV)	–	28%	4%	5%	6%	0%	12%	24%	1%	3 % [hb]	15%
Claster Consulting	28-29 août	752 (VR)	22%	3%	3%	5%	4%	19%	14%	2%	10 % [hc]	21%
Harvard-Harris	26 au 28 août	985 (RV)	32%	3%	4%	7%	4%	16%	13%	2%	6 % [HD]	11%
YouGov/Économiste	24 au 27 août	1093 (RV)	± 3,1 %	25%	2%	5%	8%	2%	14%	21%	2%	8% [il]	12%
Collège Emerson	24-26 août	627 (RV)	± 3,9 %	31%	3%	3%	dix%	2%	24%	15%	4%	8% [hf]	–
Recherche de changement	23 au 26 août	874 (LV)	± 3,3 %	19%	3%	9%	6%	3%	22%	29%	2%	7 % [hg]	–
Université Quinnipiac	21 au 26 août	648 (RV)	± 4,6 %	32%	1%	5%	7%	1%	15%	19%	3%	6% [hh]	11%
Université de Suffolk / USA Today	20 au 25 août	424 (LV)	± 4,8 %	32%	2%	6%	6%	2%	12%	14%	3%	2 % [salut]	21%
Consultation du matin	19 au 25 août	17 303 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	3%	5%	8%	3%	20%	15%	2%	9% [hj]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	23-24 août	465 (VR)	–	30%	2%	4%	4%	3%	17%	14%	2%	9 % [hk]	15%
Balanceable	22-23 août	1 849 (LV)	± 2,0 %	33%	2%	3%	9%	4%	18%	16%	1%	6% [hl]	–
HarrisX	16 au 23 août	3 132 (VR)	–	28%	4%	3%	8%	4%	17%	dix%	2%	10 % [hm]	13%
Aperçus d’échelon	19 au 21 août	479 (RV)	–	30%	4%	3%	11%	4%	19%	11%	1%	1 % [hn]	14%
YouGov/Économiste	17 au 20 août	559 (LV)	–	22%	2%	7%	8%	3%	19%	17%	1%	7 % [ho]	12%
Université de Monmouth	16 au 20 août	298 (VR)	± 5,7 %	19%	4%	4%	8%	2%	20%	20%	3%	7% [ch]	dix%
CNN/SSRS	15 au 18 août	402 (RV)	± 6,1 %	29%	2%	5%	5%	3%	15%	14%	1%	10 % [hq]	dix%
Consultation du matin	12 au 18 août	17 115 (LV)	–	31%	3%	5%	9%	3%	20%	15%	3%	8 % [h]	–
HarrisX	9 au 16 août	3 118 (VR)	–	29%	2%	4%	7%	4%	15%	11%	2%	10 % [hs]	13%
Fox News	11 au 13 août	483 (LV)	± 4,5 %	31%	3%	3%	8%	2%	dix%	20%	3%	10 % [HT]	8%
YouGov/Économiste	10 au 13 août	592 (LV)	–	21%	2%	5%	8%	5%	16%	20%	1%	8% [hu]	11%
Consultation du matin	5 au 11 août	17 117 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	3%	5%	9%	3%	20%	14%	2%	13 % [hv]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	9-10 août	451 (VR)	–	31%	1%	4%	7%	4%	16%	dix%	1%	14 % [hw]	dix%
HarrisX	2 au 9 août	3088 (VR)	–	28%	3%	4%	7%	3%	16%	dix%	1%	12 % [hx]	16%
Balanceable	5-6 août	1958 (LV)	± 2,0 %	31%	3%	5%	9%	3%	17%	15%	2%	5 % [hy]	–
YouGov/Économiste	3 au 6 août	573 (LV)	–	22%	1%	8%	8%	2%	13%	16%	2%	12 % [hertz]	14%
SurveyUSA	1er au 5 août	999 (LV)	± 4,1 %	33%	1%	8%	9%	1%	20%	19%	0%	1 % [entre autres]	7%
Ipsos/Reuters	1er au 5 août	1258 (A)	± 3,0 %	22%	3%	4%	6%	2%	18%	9%	2%	13 % [ib]	21%
Université Quinnipiac	1er au 5 août	807 (VR)	± 4,1 %	32%	2%	5%	7%	2%	14%	21%	1%	3% [ic]	dix%
Recherche de changement	2 au 4 août	1 450	± 3,0 %	23%	2%	9%	7%	2%	23%	26%	2%	4 % [identifiant]	–
Sondage sur les politiques publiques	1er au 4 août	588	± 4,0 %	36%	4%	4%	dix%	–	12%	13%	2%	4 % [c’est-à-dire]	14%
Consultation du matin	1er au 4 août	9 845 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	3%	6%	9%	3%	19%	15%	2%	10 % [si]	–
Centre de recherche Pew *	22 juillet – 4 août	1757 (VR)	± 2,9 %	26%	1%	5%	11%	1%	12%	16%	1%	9 % [ig]	18%
HarrisX [10]	31 juillet – 2 août	914 (RV)	± 3,4 %	28%	3%	3%	8%	3%	16%	8%	2%	13 % [moi]	13%
Consultation du matin	1 août	2 419 (LV)	± 2,0 %	32%	3%	6%	dix%	3%	18%	15%	2%	9 % [ii]	–
Harvard CAPS/Harris	31 juillet – 1er août	585	–	34%	2%	4%	9%	3%	17%	8%	1%	5% [ij]	14%
MICI/TIPP	25 juillet – 1er août	350 (RV)	–	30%	2%	6%	11%	1%	12%	17%	0%	7 % [ik]	dix%

Juillet 2019

scrutin de juillet 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Autre	Indécis
31 juil.	Deuxième nuit du deuxième débat primaire démocrate
Consultation du matin	31 juil.	2 410 (LV)	± 2,0 %	34%	6%	dix%	2%	19%	14%	14% [il]	–
30 juil.	Premier soir du deuxième débat primaire démocrate
YouGov/Économiste	27–30 juillet	629 (LV)	–	26%	5%	dix%	2%	13%	18%	11 % [je]	11%
Collège Emerson	27-29 juillet	520	± 4,2 %	33%	6%	11%	4%	20%	14%	11 % [po]	–
HarrisX	27-29 juillet	884 (VR)	–	32%	3%	7%	4%	15%	9%	14 % [io]	14%
La Colline/HarrisX	27-28 juillet	444 (RV)	± 4,7 %	34%	5%	9%	4%	20%	12%	9 % [ip]	8%
Université Quinnipiac	25-28 juillet	579 (VR)	± 5,1 %	34%	6%	12%	2%	11%	15%	6% [qi]	12%
McLaughlin & Associés	23-28 juillet	468	–	28%	3%	dix%	4%	15%	9%	18% [ir]	14%
Consultation du matin	22–28 juillet	16 959 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	5%	12%	3%	18%	13%	18% [est]	–
Corps de la démocratie	18-28 juillet	471	–	31%	8%	12%	2%	22%	15%	10% [le]	3%
Aperçus d’échelon	23–27 juillet	510	± 4,2 %	33%	5%	11%	3%	14%	dix%	9 % [UI]	16%
Recherche de changement	23-26 juillet	1 204	± 2,8 %	20%	9%	15%	2%	20%	22%	12 % [iv]	–
USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times	12–25 juillet	1 827	± 3,0 %	28%	5%	dix%	3%	11%	dix%	6 % [iw]	25%
Fox News	21-23 juillet	455 (LV)	± 4,5 %	33%	5%	dix%	2%	15%	12%	15 % [ix]	7%
YouGov/Économiste	21-23 juillet	600 (LV)	–	25%	6%	9%	2%	13%	18%	16 % [je]	11%
Consultation du matin	15-21 juillet	17 285 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	5%	13%	3%	18%	14%	10 % [iz]	–
HarrisX	15-17 juillet	910 (VR)	–	26%	4%	dix%	4%	14%	9%	11 % [ja]	18%
YouGov/Économiste	14-16 juillet	572 (LV)	–	23%	7%	dix%	2%	13%	15%	13% [jb]	14%
Nouvelles NBC/SurveyMonkey	2–16 juillet	5 548 (RV)	± 2,0 %	25%	8%	14%	3%	16%	16%	14% [jc]	5%
Consultation du matin	8-14 juillet	16 504 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	5%	13%	3%	19%	14%	10% [jd]	–
TheHillHarrisX	12-13 juillet	446 (RV)	± 3,1 %	29%	1%	11%	3%	16%	9%	13% [je]	17%
Nouvelles NBC/Wall Street Journal	7–9 juillet	400 (LV)	± 4,9 %	26%	7%	13%	2%	13%	19%	10% [jf]	8%
YouGov/Économiste	7–9 juillet	592 (LV)	–	22%	6%	15%	1%	12%	18%	11 % [jg]	13%
Collège Emerson	6-8 juillet	481	± 4,4 %	30%	5%	15%	4%	15%	15%	16 % [jh]	–
Balanceable	5-7 juillet	1921 (LV)	± 2,0 %	28%	6%	16%	4%	18%	12%	7 % [ji]	–
Consultation du matin	1–7 juil.	16 599 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	6%	14%	3%	19%	13%	15% [jj]	–
YouGov/Économiste	30 juin – 2 juillet	631 (LV)	–	21%	9%	13%	3%	dix%	18%	11 % [jk]	12%
Ipsos/Reuters	28 juin – 2 juillet	1 367	± 3,0 %	22%	3%	dix%	3%	16%	9%	9% [jl]	21%
YouGov Blue/Données pour le progrès	27 juin – 2 juillet	1 522	–	23%	7%	17%	2%	15%	22%	10% [jm]	–
HarrisX	29 juin – 1 juil.	882 (RV)	± 3,4 %	28%	4%	13%	3%	14%	9%	15 % [jn]	12%
ABC Nouvelles/Washington Post	28 juin – 1er juillet	460 (A)	± 5,5 %	29%	4%	11%	2%	23%	11%	13 % [jo]	6%
Recherche de changement	28 juin – 1er juillet	1 185	± 2,9 %	18%	dix%	21%	2%	17%	22%	8% [jp]	–
Université Quinnipiac	28 juin – 1er juillet	554 (RV)	± 5,0 %	22%	4%	20%	1%	13%	14%	7 % [jq]	12%

Avril–juin 2019

Sondage d’avril à juin 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Autre	Indécis
CNN/SSRS	28-30 juin	656 (VR)	± 4,7 %	22%	3%	4%	17%	3%	14%	15%	8 % [jr]	9%
HarrisX	28-30 juin	909 (VR)	± 3,4 %	28%	2%	4%	11%	3%	14%	8%	10% [js]	15%
Consultation du matin/FiveThirtyEight	27-30 juin	2 485 (LV)	± 2%	31%	2,5 %	5,9 %	16,8 %	2,1 %	16,8 %	14,4 %	6,7 % [jt]	3,9 %
Harvard-Harris	26-29 juin	845	–	34%	3%	3%	9%	2%	15%	11%	10 % [ju]	9%
Consultation du matin [11]	27-28 juin	2 407 (LV)	± 2%	33%	3%	6%	12%	2%	19%	12%	13 % [coopération]	–
27 juin	Deuxième nuit du premier débat primaire démocrate
Consultation du matin/FiveThirtyEight	26-27 juin	2041 (LV)	± 2%	33,7 %	3,6 %	4,8 %	6,6 %	3,1 %	17,8 %	17,7 %	9,6 % [jw]	3,3 %
26 juin	Première nuit du premier débat primaire démocrate
YouGov Blue/Données pour le progrès	25-26 juin	1 402	–	30%	2%	7%	7%	3%	16%	24%	7 % [jx]	–
HarrisX	24-26 juin	892 (VR)	± 3,4 %	29%	1%	3%	6%	4%	17%	9%	12 % [jy]	15%
Consultation du matin/FiveThirtyEight	19-26 juin	7150 (LV)	± 1%	38,5 %	2,8 %	6,9 %	7,9 %	3,9 %	16,3 %	12,7 %	5,3 % [jz]	5,5 %
Aperçus d’échelon	22-25 juin	484	–	32%	2%	9%	6%	3%	15%	11%	6 % [ka]	19%
YouGov/Économiste	22-25 juin	522 (LV)	–	24%	2%	5%	7%	3%	15%	18%	11 % [ko]	12%
Collège Emerson	21-24 juin	457	± 4,5 %	34%	3%	6%	7%	1%	27%	14%	8 % [kc]	–
McLaughlin & Associés	18-24 juin	459	–	34%	2%	6%	6%	4%	17%	11%	11 % [kd]	12%
Consultation du matin	17-23 juin	16 188 (LV)	± 1,0 %	38%	3%	7%	6%	4%	19%	13%	15 % [ke]	–
Recherche de changement	19-21 juin	1 071	–	24%	2%	13%	8%	2%	22%	22%	5% [kf]	–
YouGov/Économiste	16-18 juin	576 (LV)	–	26%	2%	9%	7%	4%	13%	14%	9% [kg]	15%
Université de Monmouth	12–17 juin	306	± 5,6 %	32%	2%	5%	8%	3%	14%	15%	7% [kh]	11%
Consultation du matin	10-16 juin	17 226 (LV)	± 1,0 %	38%	3%	7%	7%	4%	19%	11%	12 % [ki]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	14-15 juin	424 (VR)	± 4,8 %	35%	3%	4%	5%	6%	13%	7%	10 % [kj]	17%
Université de Suffolk/USA Today	11-15 juin	385	± 5,0 %	30%	2%	9%	8%	2%	15%	dix%	5 % [kk]	17%
Renseignement WPA (R) [C]	10-13 juin	1 000	± 3,1 %	35%	3%	8%	9%	4%	14%	dix%	3% [kl]	13%
Fox News	9-12 juin	449 (LV)	± 4,5 %	32%	3%	8%	8%	4%	13%	9%	9% [km]	dix%
YouGov/Économiste	9-11 juin	513 (LV)	–	26%	2%	8%	6%	3%	12%	16%	8 % [kn]	14%
Université Quinnipiac	6-10 juin	503	± 5,4 %	30%	1%	8%	7%	3%	19%	15%	5 % [ko]	13%
Recherche de changement	5-10 juin	1 621	± 2,6 %	26%	1%	14%	8%	3%	21%	19%	7 % [kp]	–
Consultation du matin	3–9 juin	17 012 (LV)	± 1,0 %	37%	3%	7%	7%	4%	19%	11%	14 % [kq]	–
Ipsos/Reuters	29 mai – 5 juin	2 525	–	30%	2%	5%	6%	4%	15%	8%	7 % [€]	13%
YouGov/Économiste	2-4 juin	550 (LV)	–	27%	2%	9%	8%	2%	16%	11%	8 % [ks]	15%
Stratégies de rue de parc	24 mai – 4 juin	600 (LV)	± 4%	32%	1%	7%	12%	1%	15%	13%	19 % [kt]	–
Balanceable	1–3 juin	977 (LV)	± 3,0 %	40%	4%	6%	8%	3%	20%	7%	7 % [ku]	–
Stratégie d’avalanche	31 mai – 3 juin	1 109	–	29%	–	13%	12%	4%	17%	16%	–	–
La Colline/HarrisX	1–2 juin	431 (VR)	± 4,7 %	35%	3%	8%	4%	4%	16%	5%	5% [kv]	17%
Consultation du matin	27 mai – 2 juin	16 587 (LV)	± 1,0 %	38%	3%	7%	7%	4%	19%	dix%	15 % [kW]	–
CNN/SSRS	28-31 mai	412	± 6,0 %	32%	3%	5%	8%	5%	18%	7%	12 % [kx]	8%
Harvard-Harris	29-30 mai	471	–	36%	3%	5%	8%	4%	17%	5%	9 % [ky]	12%
Consultation du matin	20-26 mai	16 368 (LV)	± 1,0 %	38%	3%	7%	7%	4%	20%	9%	13 % [kz]	–
HarrisX	23-25 ​​mai	881 (VR)	± 3,4 %	33%	3%	5%	6%	3%	15%	7%	8 % [la]	14%
Aperçus d’échelon	20-21 mai	447	–	38%	2%	5%	5%	5%	16%	5%	9 % [lb]	16%
Recherche de changement	18-21 mai	1 420	± 2,6 %	31%	2%	9%	8%	4%	22%	15%	8% [ml]	–
Université de Monmouth	16-20 mai	334	± 5,4 %	33%	1%	6%	11%	4%	15%	dix%	8% [ld]	9%
Université Quinnipiac	16-20 mai	454	± 5,6 %	35%	3%	5%	8%	2%	16%	13%	5% [le]	11%
Consultation du matin	13-19 mai	14 830 (LV)	± 1,0 %	39%	3%	6%	8%	4%	19%	9%	13 % [lf]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	18-19 mai	448 (VR)	± 4,6 %	33%	1%	6%	6%	5%	14%	8%	8 % [lg]	19%
Fox News	11-14 mai	469 (LV)	± 4,5 %	35%	3%	6%	5%	4%	17%	9%	10% [lh]	8%
Ipsos/Reuters	10-14 mai	1 132	± 3,0 %	29%	2%	4%	6%	6%	13%	6%	10 %	16%
Collège Emerson	10-13 mai	429	± 4,7 %	33%	1%	8%	dix%	3%	25%	dix%	12 % [lj]	–
HarrisX	8-13 mai	2207 (RV)	± 3,1 %	39%	4%	5%	6%	5%	20%	8%	11 % [lk]	–
Consultation du matin	6-12 mai	15 342 (LV)	± 1,0 %	39%	3%	6%	8%	5%	19%	8%	12 % [ll]	–
McLaughlin & Associés	7 au 11 mai	360	–	30%	5%	4%	7%	5%	19%	7%	13 % [ml]	13%
Zogby Analytics Archivé le 8 novembre 2020 sur la Wayback Machine	2 au 9 mai	463	–	37%	3%	7%	5%	5%	15%	6%	11 % [n]	dix%
GBAO	1er au 5 mai	800	± 3,5 %	36%	3%	5%	6%	4%	13%	8%	3% [bas]	22%
Consultation du matin	29 avril – 5 mai	15 770 (LV)	± 1,0 %	40%	3%	6%	7%	5%	19%	8%	12 % [pl]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	3-4 mai	440 (RV)	± 5,0 %	46%	3%	8%	6%	3%	14%	7%	14 % [lq]	–
Harvard-Harris	30 avril – 1er mai	259 (RV)	–	44%	3%	2%	9%	3%	14%	5%	6% [lr]	11%
Université Quinnipiac	26-29 avril	419	± 5,6 %	38%	2%	dix%	8%	5%	11%	12%	4% [ls]	8%
HarrisX	26-28 avril	741 (RV)	± 3,7 %	33%	3%	5%	5%	5%	16%	6%	10 % [lt]	13%
CNN/SSRS	25-28 avril	411	± 5,9 %	39%	2%	7%	5%	6%	15%	8%	10% [lu]	7%
Consultation du matin	22-28 avril	15 475 (LV)	± 1,0 %	36%	3%	8%	7%	5%	22%	9%	14% [niv]	–
25 avril	Biden annonce sa candidature
Ipsos/Reuters	17-23 avril	2 237	–	24%	3%	7%	6%	6%	15%	5%	13 % [lw]	21%
Consultation du matin	15-21 avril	14 335 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	4%	9%	8%	6%	24%	7%	12 % [lx]	–
Aperçus d’échelon	17-19 avril	499	–	26%	3%	7%	6%	9%	22%	3%	6 % [an]	18%
Recherche de changement	12-15 avril	2 518	± 2,2 %	21%	4%	17%	7%	9%	20%	8%	15 % [lz]	–
–	5%	21%	dix%	14%	26%	dix%	14 % [ma]	–
Université de Monmouth	11-15 avril	330	± 5,4 %	27%	2%	8%	8%	4%	20%	6%	5 % [mo]	14%
–	3%	11%	11%	6%	27%	8%	7 % [mc]	20%
USC Dornsife/LAT	15 mars – 15 avril	2 196	± 2,0 %	27%	2%	2%	7%	7%	16%	4%	9 % [md]	27%
14 avril	Buttigieg annonce sa candidature
Collège Emerson	11-14 avril	356	± 5,2 %	24%	2%	9%	8%	8%	29%	7%	14% [moi]	–
Consultation du matin	8-14 avril	12 550 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	4%	7%	9%	8%	23%	7%	14 % [mf]	–
–	6%	9%	12%	11%	35%	dix%	19 % [mg]	–
Consultation du matin	1er au 7 avril	13 644 (LV)	± 1,0 %	32%	4%	5%	9%	8%	23%	7%	14 % [mh]	–
La Colline/HarrisX	5-6 avril	370 (VR)	± 5,0 %	36%	6%	4%	9%	7%	19%	6%	14 % [mi]	–

Mars 2019

Sondage de mars 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Pete Buttigieg	Kamala Harris	Amy Klobuchar	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Autre	Indécis
HarrisX	29-31 mars	743 (RV)	± 3,7 %	29%	4%	3%	6%	2%	6%	18%	5%	6 % [mj]	16%
Consultation du matin	25 au 31 mars	12 940 (LV)	± 1,0 %	33%	4%	2%	8%	3%	8%	25%	7%	10 % [mk]	–
Harvard-Harris	25-26 mars	263	–	35%	4%	2%	5%	2%	7%	17%	6%	9% [ml]	13%
Université Quinnipiac	21-25 mars	559	± 5,1 %	29%	2%	4%	8%	2%	12%	19%	4%	2% [mm]	14%
Consultation du matin	18–24 mars	13 725 (LV)	± 1,0 %	35%	4%	2%	8%	2%	8%	25%	7%	10 % [mk]	–
Fox News	17-20 mars	403	± 5,0 %	31%	4%	1%	8%	1%	8%	23%	4%	8 % [millions]	11%
Collège Emerson	17-18 mars	487	± 4,4 %	26%	3%	3%	12%	1%	11%	26%	8%	10 % [mois]	–
CNN/SSRS	14–17 mars	456	± 5,7 %	28%	3%	1%	12%	3%	11%	20%	6%	10 % [mp]	5%
Consultation du matin	11–17 mars	13 551 (LV)	± 1,0 %	35%	4%	1%	8%	2%	8%	27%	7%	9 % [m2]	–
14 mars	O’Rourke annonce sa candidature
Recherche de changement	8-10 mars	1 919	–	36%	3%	2%	9%	2%	7%	24%	9%	8% [monsieur]	–
–	5%	1%	17%	3%	14%	36%	13%	9 % [ms]	–
HarrisX	8-10 mars	740 (RV)	± 3,7 %	27%	4%	0%	8%	2%	6%	19%	4%	8 % [tonnes]	16%
Consultation du matin	4 au 10 mars	15 226 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	4%	1%	dix%	3%	7%	27%	7%	11 % [mu]	–
5 mars	Bloomberg annonce qu’il ne se présentera pas
4 mars	Clinton annonce qu’elle ne se présentera pas
Université de Monmouth	1er au 4 mars	310	± 5,6 %	28%	5%	<1 %	dix%	3%	6%	25%	8%	7 % [vm]	8%
–	6%	<1 %	15%	3%	7%	32%	dix%	9 % [mw]	15%
GBAO	25 février – 3 mars	817	–	28%	3%	0%	9%	2%	7%	20%	5%	4 % [mx]	22%
Consultation du matin	25 février – 3 mars	12 560 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	4%	1%	11%	3%	6%	27%	7%	12 % [mes]	–

Janvier–Février 2019

Sondage de janvier à février 2019

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Cory Booker	Kamala Harris	Amy Klobuchar	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Autre	Indécis
Consultation du matin	18 au 24 février	15 642 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	2%	4%	dix%	3%	7%	27%	7%	13 % [mz]	–
Harvard-Harris	19-20 février	337	–	37%	3%	2%	dix%	–	6%	22%	4%	5 % [na]	dix%
19 février	Sanders annonce sa candidature
Consultation du matin	11-17 février	15 383 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	2%	5%	11%	4%	7%	21%	8%	11 % [nombre]	–
Collège Emerson	14-16 février	431	± 4,7 %	27%	2%	9%	15%	5%	4%	17%	9%	12 % [nc]	–
Campagnes bleues audacieuses	9 au 11 février	500	± 4,5 %	12%	<1 %	<1 %	11%	1%	7%	9%	3%	9 % [nd]	48%
10 février	Klobuchar annonce sa candidature
Consultation du matin	4 au 10 février	11 627 (LV)	± 1,0 %	29%	2%	5%	13%	3%	7%	22%	8%	11 % [ne]	–
9 février	Warren annonce sa candidature
Consultation du matin	28 janvier – 3 février	14 494 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	2%	4%	14%	2%	6%	21%	9%	9 % [nf]	–
Consultation du matin/Politique	1er au 2 février	737 (VR)	± 4,0 %	29%	2%	5%	14%	2%	5%	16%	6%	7 % [ng]	13%
1er février	Booker annonce sa candidature
Université de Monmouth	25–27 janvier	313	± 5,5 %	29%	4%	4%	11%	2%	7%	16%	8%	8 % [nh]	9%
Consultation du matin/Politique	25–27 janvier	685 (RV)	± 4,0 %	33%	2%	3%	dix%	1%	6%	15%	6%	10 % [ni]	15%
Consultation du matin	21-27 janvier	14 381 (LV)	± 1,0 %	31%	3%	3%	11%	2%	7%	21%	9%	9 % [nj]	–
Consultation du matin/Politique	18–22 janvier	694 (VR)	± 4,0 %	26%	2%	4%	9%	2%	6%	16%	6%	11 % [nb]	18%
21 janvier	Harris annonce sa candidature
Collège Emerson	20-21 janvier	355	± 5,2 %	45%	7%	8%	3%	1%	3%	5%	3%	25 % [nl]	–
–	–	–	19%	–	–	–	43%	38 % [nm]	–
Zogby Analytique	18-20 janvier	410	± 4,8 %	27%	8%	1%	6%	–	6%	18%	9%	5 % [nn]	21%
Consultation du matin	14-20 janvier	14 250 (LV)	± 1,0 %	30%	4%	3%	6%	2%	8%	23%	11%	9% [non]	–
Harvard-Harris	15-16 janvier	479	–	23%	5%	3%	7%	–	8%	21%	4%	8 % [np]	15%
Consultation du matin/Politique	11-14 janvier	674 (RV)	± 4,0 %	32%	1%	2%	6%	1%	8%	15%	9%	9 % [nq]	18%
Consultation du matin	7-13 janvier	4749 (LV)	± 2,0 %	31%	4%	3%	7%	2%	8%	23%	11%	8 % [nombre]	–

Avant 2019

Octobre–Décembre 2018

Vote d’octobre à décembre 2018

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Cory Booker	Kamala Harris	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Autre	Indécis
CNN/SSRS	6 au 9 décembre	463	± 5,6 %	30%	3%	5%	4%	9%	14%	3%	15 % [ns]	9%
Collège Emerson	6 au 9 décembre	320	–	26%	–	–	9%	15%	22%	7%	22 % [nt]	–
Harvard-Harris	27-28 novembre	449	–	28%	4%	4%	3%	7%	21%	5%	4 % [nu]	18%
Consultation du matin/Politique	7 au 9 novembre	733 (RV)	± 4,0 %	26%	2%	3%	4%	8%	19%	5%	12 % [nv]	21%
CNN/SSRS	4 au 7 octobre	464	± 5,5 %	33%	4%	5%	9%	4%	13%	8%	16 % [nw]	6%

Avant octobre 2018

Sondage avant décembre 2018

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Cory Booker	Andrew Cuomo	Kirsten Gillibrand	Kamala Harris	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Oprah Winfrey	Autre	Indécis
2018
Zogby Analytique	6 au 8 août	576	± 4,1 %	27%	4%	3%	2%	5%	16%	7%	–	7 % [nx]	31%
Recherche GQR	19-26 juillet	443	–	30%	8%	–	–	5%	28%	13%	–	8 % [néant]	9%
Zogby Analytique	4-6 juin	495	± 4,4 %	21%	4%	4%	1%	5%	19%	6%	dix%	2 % [nz]	29%
Université Saint-Léo	25-31 mai	–	–	19%	2%	4%	2%	4%	9%	4%	15%	15 % [oa]	21%
Zogby Analytique	10-12 mai	533	± 4,2 %	26%	3%	2%	1%	4%	18%	8%	14%	5 % [ob]	22%
Civis Analytics	janvier 2018	–	–	29%	–	–	–	–	27%	–	17%	–	–
Recherche RABA	10-11 janvier	345	± 5,0 %	26%	–	–	–	–	21%	18%	20%	–	15%
SurveyMonkey/Axios	10-11 janvier	–	–	22%	3%	–	4%	7%	17%	16%	16%	9 % [oc]	–
Collège Emerson	8-11 janvier	216 [ citation nécessaire ]	–	27%	3%	–	3%	2%	23%	9%	–	15 % [od]	19%
Recherche GQR	6-11 janvier	442	–	26%	6%	–	–	–	29%	14%	8%	12 % [pe]	6%
2017
Zogby Analytique	7–9 septembre	356	± 5,2 %	17%	–	3%	3%	6%	28%	12%	–	9 % [de]	23%
Gravis Marketing	21-31 juillet	1 917	–	21%	4%	1%	2%	6%	–	–	–	8 % [og]	43%
2016
Sondage sur les politiques publiques	6 et 7 décembre	400	± 4,9 %	31%	4%	2%	3%	–	24%	16%	–	7% [oh]	14%

Sondages incluant Hillary Clinton et Michelle Obama

Sondages incluant Clinton et Obama

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Cory Booker	Hillary Clinton	Kamala Harris	Michelle obama	Beto O’Rourke	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Oprah Winfrey	Autre	Indécis
McLaughlin & Associés	14 au 18 décembre 2019	480 (LV)	–	23%	5%	4%	6%	–	–	–	17%	15%	–	22 % [sur]	dix%
Zogby Analytique	5 au 8 décembre 2019	443 (LV)	± 4,7 %	28%	9%	– [jo]	6%	–	–	–	20%	12%	–	21 % [d’accord]	5%
Harvard-Harris	Du 27 au 29 novembre 2019	756 (VR)	–	20%	5%	1%	22%	2%	–	1%	12%	9%	–	22 % [ol]	7%
Harvard-Harris	29 au 31 octobre 2019	640 (RV) [dv]	–	19%	6%	3%	18%	3%	–	2%	12%	13%	–	17 % [moins]	7%
Fox News	27 au 30 octobre 2019	471 (LV)	± 4,5 %	–	–	–	27%	–	–	–	–	–	–	30 % [sur]	43%
–	–	–	–	–	50%	–	–	–	–	8 % [oo]	42%
McLaughlin & Associés	17 au 22 octobre 2019	468 (LV)	–	– [op]	1%	4%	dix%	9%	–	3%	23%	20%	–	21 % [oq]	dix%
Harvard-Harris	30 avril – 1er mai 2019	254 (RV)	–	34%	2%	5%	6%	4%	–	8%	17%	3%	–	12 % [ou]	9%
ABC Nouvelles/Washington Post *	22 au 25 avril 2019	427 (A)	± 5,5 %	17%	<1 %	1%	2%	4%	2%	4%	11%	4%	–	14 % [os]	35%
Harvard-Harris	25-26 mars 2019	273	–	26%	0%	3%	11%	11%	–	5%	18%	5%	–	6 % [sur]	12%
McLaughlin & Associés	Du 20 au 24 mars 2019	447	–	28%	–	3%	8%	8%	–	8%	17%	5%	–	8 % [ou]	16%
D-CYFOR	22-23 février 2019	453	–	39%	2%	4%	8%	8%	–	3%	14%	5%	–	5 % [vo]	11%
Harvard-Harris	19 et 20 février 2019	346	–	30%	2%	5%	dix%	dix%	–	4%	19%	4%	–	1 % [sur]	13%
La Colline/HarrisX	17 et 18 février 2019	370 (VR)	± 5,0 %	25%	5%	4%	–	12%	25%	6%	11%	5%	–	7% [bœuf]	–
McLaughlin & Associés	6 au 10 février 2019	450	–	25%	2%	3%	7%	8%	–	6%	16%	5%	5%	10 % [oy]	15%
ABC Nouvelles/Washington Post *	Du 21 au 24 janvier 2019	447	± 5,5 %	9%	<1 %	1%	1%	8%	2%	3%	4%	2%	1%	11 % [oz]	43%
Zogby Analytique	Du 18 au 20 janvier 2019	410	± 4,8 %	25%	5%	3%	–	5%	17%	4%	12%	5%	–	5 % [pa]	20%
Harvard-Harris	15 et 16 janvier 2019	488	–	24%	5%	2%	dix%	4%	–	9%	13%	5%	–	6 % [pb]	17%
Consultation du matin/Politique	Du 4 au 6 janvier 2019	699 (RV)	± 4,0 %	27%	1%	3%	12%	3%	–	7%	16%	4%	–	9 % [pc]	15%
Recherche de changement	13 au 17 décembre 2018	2 968	–	21%	2%	4%	5%	8%	–	21%	16%	7%	–	18 % [pd]	–
Consultation du matin/Politique	14 au 16 décembre 2018	706 (VR)	± 4,0 %	25%	2%	3%	13%	3%	–	8%	15%	3%	–	13 % [pe]	15%
McLaughlin & Associés	10 au 14 décembre 2018	468	–	17%	2%	–	9%	3%	16%	11%	18%	4%	3%	7 % [pf]	11%
Harvard-Harris	27 et 28 novembre 2018	459	–	25%	2%	3%	13%	2%	–	9%	15%	4%	–	5 % [pg]	15%
La Colline/HarrisX	5 et 6 novembre 2018	370 (VR)	± 5,0 %	30%	5%	5%	16%	5%	–	–	20%	5%	–	–	14%
Recherche de changement	Du 24 au 26 octobre 2018	–	–	23%	–	5%	6%	dix%	–	dix%	18%	9%	–	8 % [ph]	–
Harvard-Harris	24 et 25 juin 2018	533	–	32%	3%	6%	18%	2%	–	–	16%	dix%	–	14 % [pi]	–
Harvard-Harris	Du 13 au 16 janvier 2018	711	–	27%	–	4%	13%	4%	–	–	16%	dix%	13%	13 % [pp]	–
USC Dornsife/LAT	15 décembre 2017 – 15 janvier 2018	1 576	± 3,0 %	28%	–	3%	19%	5%	–	–	22%	11%	–	7 % [pk]	–
Zogby Analytique	Du 19 au 25 octobre 2017	682	± 3,8 %	19%	–	–	–	3%	22%	–	18%	8%	–	10 % [pl]	20%

Des sondages en tête-à-tête

Données de sondage en tête-à-tête prises alors que plus de deux candidats majeurs étaient dans la course

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Taille de l’échantillon [a]	Marge d’erreur	Joe Biden	Michel Bloomberg	Pete Buttigieg	Kirsten Gillibrand	Kamala Harris	Amy Klobuchar	Bernie Sanders	Elisabeth Warren	Oprah Winfrey	Indécis
Ipsos/Reuters	13-16 mars 2020	458 (RV)	± 5,2 %	54%	–	–	–	–	–	46%	–	–	–
Ipsos/Reutuers	6-9 mars 2020	420 (VR)	± 5,5 %	59%	–	–	–	–	–	41%	–	–	–
Ipsos/Reuters	4-5 mars 2020	474 (VR)	± 5,1 %	55%	–	–	–	–	–	45%	–	–	–
Ipsos/Reuters	28 février-2 mars 2020	469 (VR)	± 5,2 %	48%	–	–	–	–	–	52%	–	–	–
–	41%	59%
Recherche sur le changement/Science électorale	25 au 27 février 2020	821 (LV)	–	78,6 %	21,4 %	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
45,4 %	–	54,6 %	–	–	–
51,1 %	–	–	48,9 %	–	–
35,7 %	–	–	–	64,3 %	–
32,4 %	–	–	–	–	67,6 %
–	77,1 %	22,9 %	–	–	–
–	27,4 %	–	72,6 %	–	–
–	24,9 %	–	–	75,1 %	–
–	22,7 %	–	–	–	77,3 %
–	–	57,5 %	42,5 %	–	–
–	–	37,2 %	–	62,8 %	–
–	–	31,9 %	–	–	68,1 %
–	–	–	31,9 %	68,1 %	–
–	–	–	22,6 %	–	77,4 %
–	–	–	–	54,2 %	45,8 %
Nouvelles NBC/Wall Street Journal	14-17 février 2020	426 (LV)	± 4,8 % [après-midi]	–	38%	–	–	–	–	59%	–	–	3%
± 4,8 % [pn]	–	40%	57%	5%
Zogby Analytique	13-14 février 2020	732 (LV)	± 3,6 %	–	50%	–	–	–	–	50%	–	–	–
Nouvelles YouGov/Yahoo	12 et 13 février 2020	367 (LV)	–	47%	34%	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	19%
347 (LV)	45%	–	42%	–	–	–	13%
362 (LV)	43%	–	–	45%	–	–	12%
359 (LV)	44%	–	–	–	48%	–	8%
366 (LV)	41%	–	–	–	–	49%	9%
331 (LV)	–	37%	44%	–	–	–	19%
351 (LV)	–	38%	–	43%	–	–	20%
369 (LV)	–	38%	–	–	53%	–	dix%
375 (LV)	–	38%	–	–	–	52%	dix%
388 (LV)	–	–	33%	44%	–	–	23%
347 (LV)	–	–	37%	–	54%	–	dix%
347 (LV)	–	–	34%	–	–	52%	14%
383 (LV)	–	–	–	33%	54%	–	13%
344 (LV)	–	–	–	31%	–	50%	19%
348 (LV)	–	–	–	–	44%	42%	14%
YouGov Blue/Données pour le progrès [A]	Du 18 au 26 janvier 2020	1619 (LV)	± 2,6 %	53%	–	–	–	–	–	41%	–	–	–
47%	–	–	–	–	45%	–	–
Aperçus d’échelon	Du 20 au 23 janvier 2020	474 (LV)	–	56%	32%	–	–	–	–	–	12%
54%	–	–	–	38%	–	–	8%
48%	–	–	–	–	43%	–	9%
Aperçus d’échelon	9 au 14 décembre 2019	447 (LV)	–	65%	20%	–	–	–	–	–	16%
58%	–	–	–	32%	–	–	11%
59%	–	–	–	–	29%	–	11%
Balanceable	Du 16 au 18 novembre 2019	2077 (LV)	± 2%	44,8 %	–	–	–	–	34,2 %	–	21 % [po]
Balanceable	26 et 27 octobre 2019	2172 (LV)	± 2%	45,2 %	–	–	–	–	34,7 %	–	20,1 % [po]
Aperçus d’échelon	21 au 25 octobre 2019	449 (LV)	–	62%	–	–	25%	–	–	–	13%
60%	–	–	–	28%	–	–	11%
49%	–	–	–	–	34%	–	17%
Balanceable	7 et 8 octobre 2019	2077 (LV)	± 2%	48,1 %	–	–	–	–	36,2 %	–	15,7 % [po]
HarrisX [note 1]	Du 4 au 6 octobre 2019	803 (LV)	–	41%	–	–	41%	–	–	–	18%
41%	–	40%	–	19%
42%	–	–	39%	20%
–	38%	42%	–	19%
–	40%	–	36%	24%
–	–	42%	40%	18%
Balanceable	25 et 26 septembre 2019	3 491 (LV)	± 2%	47,7 %	–	–	–	–	34,2 %	–	18,1 % [po]
Consultation du matin	Du 20 au 22 septembre 2019	635 (LV)	–	52%	–	–	–	37%	–	–	12%
45%	–	38%	17%
–	38%	49%	13%
Balanceable	Du 16 au 18 septembre 2019	3140 (LV)	± 2%	49,8 %	–	–	–	31%	–	–	19,2 % [po]
Fox News	Du 15 au 17 septembre 2019	480 (LV)	± 4,5 %	53%	–	–	–	–	37%	–	7%
YouGov/FairVote [12] [pp]	Du 2 au 6 septembre 2019	1002(LV)	± 3,3 %	51%	–	–	–	–	40%	–	–	7%
43%	–	–	–	–	49%	6%
–	–	–	–	36%	55%	7%
63,5 %	36,5 %	–	–	–	–	–
60,4 %	–	39,6 %	–	–	–
86,4 %	–	–	16,4 %	–	–
–	44,6 %	55,4 %	–	–	–
–	72,8 %	–	27,2 %	–	–
–	34,6 %	–	–	65,4 %	–
–	20,7 %	–	–	–	79,3 %
–	–	79,6 %	20,4 %	–	–
–	–	42,3 %	–	57,7 %	–
–	–	24,6 %	–	–	75,4 %
–	–	–	22,8 %	77,2 %	–
–	–	–	9,9 %	–	90,1 %
Balanceable	22-23 août 2019	1 849 (LV)	± 2%	46,8 %	–	–	–	–	30,5 %	–	–	22,7 % [po]
Aperçus d’échelon	Du 19 au 21 août 2019	479 (RV)	–	55%	–	–	31%	–	–	–	14%
55%	–	35%	–	dix%
52%	–	–	32%	16%
HarrisX	16 au 18 août 2019	909 (VR)	–	42%	–	–	38%	–	–	–	19%
44%	–	38%	–	18%
39%	–	–	41%	20%
–	35%	42%	–	23%
–	38%	–	33%	30%
–	–	43%	37%	21%
Balanceable	5 et 6 août 2019	1958 (LV)	± 2%	46,5 %	–	–	–	30,6 %	–	–	22,9 % [po]
Aperçus d’échelon	Du 23 au 27 juillet 2019	510 (RV)	–	56%	–	–	33%	–	–	–	11%
58%	–	29%	–	12%
54%	–	–	35%	dix%
Balanceable	Du 5 au 7 juillet 2019	1921 (LV)	± 2%	43%	–	–	–	32%	–	–	25 % [po]
HarrisX	28-30 juin 2019	909 (VR)	± 3,4 %	40%	–	–	41%	–	–	–	20%
41%	–	–	–	40%	–	–	19%
41%	–	–	–	–	40%	–	19%
–	–	–	39%	41%	–	–	20%
–	–	–	34%	–	35%	–	31%
–	–	–	–	41%	36%	–	23%
Aperçus d’échelon	Du 22 au 25 juin 2019	484	–	57%	–	–	–	27%	–	–	16%
56%	–	–	–	–	26%	–	18%
Balanceable	1–3 juin 2019	977 (LV)	± 3%	53,4 %	–	–	–	28,6 %	–	–	18 % [po]
HarrisX	28-30 mai 2019	881 (VR)	± 3,4 %	41%	–	–	38%	–	–	–	20%
43%	–	–	–	41%	–	–	16%
39%	–	–	–	–	41%	–	20%
–	–	–	37%	42%	–	–	21%
–	–	–	–	37%	40%	–	23%
Aperçus d’échelon	20-21 mai 2019	447	–	65%	17%	–	–	–	–	–	19%
63%	–	–	20%	–	–	–	17%
61%	–	–	–	25%	–	–	14%
66%	–	–	–	–	19%	–	15%
Consultation du matin/Politique	Du 11 au 16 janvier 2018	689 (VR)	± 4,0 %	54%	–	–	–	–	–	31%	15%
–	–	23%	–	–	–	44%	34%
–	–	–	–	46%	–	37%	17%
–	–	–	–	–	35%	39%	26%

Notes de faveur

Favorabilité nette (favorable − défavorable)

De février 2020 à avril 2020

Notes de faveur de février 2020 à avril 2020

Origine du sondage	Date(s) d’administration	Biden	Ponceuses	Gabbard	Garenne	Bloomberg	Klobuchar	Buttigieg	Steyer	patrick	Bennett	yang
YouGov/Économiste	26-28 avril 2020	51%
Collège Emerson	26-28 avril 2020	61,1 %
YouGov/Économiste	19-21 avril 2020	54%
Consultation du matin/Politique	18-19 avril 2020	66%
Consultation du matin	13 au 19 avril 2020	60%
YouGov/Économiste	12 au 14 avril 2020	54%
Consultation du matin	6-12 avril 2020	57%
YouGov/Économiste	5 au 7 avril 2020	58%	52%
Fox News	Du 4 au 7 avril 2020	61%
Monmouth	Du 3 au 7 avril 2020	57%	45%
Quinnipiac	Du 2 au 6 avril 2020	66%
Consultation du matin	31 mars – 5 avril 2020	56%	51%
YouGov/Économiste	29-31 mars 2020	43%	52%
Selzer & Co./Grinnell College	27 au 30 mars 2020	59%	49%
Consultation du matin	Du 23 au 29 mars 2020	56%	49%
YouGov/Économiste	22-24 mars 2020	47%	39%
Monmouth	Du 18 au 22 mars 2020	69%
Consultation du matin	16 au 22 mars 2020	56%	50%
YouGov/Économiste	Du 15 au 17 mars 2020	50%	50%	-14%
Ipsos/Reutuers	13 au 16 mars 2020	62%	58%
Consultation du matin	11-15 mars 2020	57%	52%	-6%
NBC/WSJ [pq]	11-13 mars 2020	55%	51%
Université YouGov/Hofstra	5-12 mars 2020	74,1 %	53,4 %	71,6 %
YouGov/Économiste	8-10 mars 2020	47%	40%
Ipsos/Reuters	Du 6 au 9 mars 2020	70%	59%
Consultation du matin	5 au 8 mars 2020	55%	46%	-dix%
Quinnipiac	5 au 8 mars 2020	64%	54%
CNN/SSRS	Du 4 au 7 mars 2020	51%	40%	39%	-11%
YouGov/Économiste	1–3 mars 2020	41%	36%	-23%	50%	-7%	36%	36%
Nouvelles YouGov/Yahoo	26 et 27 février 2020	57%	57%	60%	15%	48%	44%
Recherche sur le changement/Science électorale [13] [pr]	25 au 27 février 2020	36%	60%	7%	55%	20%	28%	39%	13%
Consultation du matin	23 au 27 février 2020	40%	52%	-8%	35%	17%	26%	35%	16%
Fox News	Feb 23–26, 2020	47%	48%	38%	22%	27%	35%	17%
YouGov/Economist	Feb 23–25, 2020	37%	51%	-26%	52%	-12%	36%	26%	19%
Morning Consult	Feb 20, 2020	17%
YouGov/Economist	Feb 16–18, 2020	39%	46%	-28%	53%	15%	41%	43%	26%
Morning Consult	Feb 12–17, 2020	39%	53%	-7%	36%	36%	32%	41%	18%
YouGov/Economist	Feb 9–11, 2020	34%	48%	−20%	51%	28%	35%	39%	33%	11%	17%	51%
Ipsos/Reuters	Feb 6–10, 2020	56%	65%	56%	53%	36%	49%	26%
Monmouth	Feb 6–9, 2020	38%	53%	48%	14%	31%	36%
Quinnipiac	Feb 5–9, 2020	54%	58%	60%	40%	49%	47%	20%	32%
Morning Consult	Feb 4–9, 2020	43%	53%	−6%	41%	40%	28%	42%	21%	4%	8%	35%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Feb 7–8, 2020	33.9%	42.8%	37.1%	23.1%	35.8%	12.9%	20.7%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Feb 4–6, 2020	39.5%	41.5%	38.3%	19.6%	33.8%	11.4%	21.6%
YouGov/Economist	Feb 2–4, 2020	40%	38%	−27%	49%	26%	32%	40%	29%	11%	19%	46%
Morning Consult	Jan 27 – Feb 2, 2020	47%	53%	−7%	44%	37%	23%	33%	23%	5%	8%	35%

From October 2019 to January 2020

Favorability ratings from October 2019 to January 2020

Poll source	Date(s) administered	Biden	Sanders	Gabbard	Warren	Bloomberg	Klobuchar	Buttigieg	Steyer	Patrick	Bennet	Yang	Delaney	Booker	Williamson	Castro	Harris	Bullock	Sestak	Messam	O’Rourke	Ryan
YouGov/Economist	Jan 26–28, 2020	40%	45%	−30%	58%	12%	33%	38%	19%	8%	11%	47%	1%
Morning Consult	Jan 20–26, 2020	52%	52%	−5%	43%	33%	25%	35%	22%	4%	11%	36%	5%
Echelon Insights	Jan 20–23, 2020	51%	52%	50%	44%	47%
YouGov/Economist	Jan 19–21, 2020	50%	50%	−19%	57%	22%	36%	37%	30%	4%	15%	47%	−1%
Monmouth	Jan 16–20, 2020	52%	48%	42%	17%	32%	27%	6%	35%
Morning Consult	Jan 15–19, 2020	51%	53%	−6%	44%	32%	24%	34%	24%	5%	10%	36%	4%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Jan 14–15, 2020	43.6%	44.2%	47.1%	18.1%	31.2%	15%
YouGov/Economist	Jan 11–14, 2020	43%	49%	−34%	53%	11%	21%	29%	15%	1%	3%	28%	−7%	42%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Jan 10–13, 2020	45.3%	47.8%	43.3%	12.3%	26.5%	9.9%
Morning Consult	Jan 6–12, 2020	49%	59%	−6%	47%	23%	21%	34%	21%	6%	8%	32%	4%	32%
YouGov/Economist	Jan 5–7, 2020	43%	55%	−31%	60%	4%	26%	36%	19%	8%	10%	34%	−2%	44%	−22%
Morning Consult	Dec 30, 2019 – Jan 5, 2020	52%	56%	−8%	44%	17%	21%	34%	20%	4%	8%	31%	3%	29%	−6%
YouGov/Economist	Dec 28–31, 2019	48%	49%	−25%	55%	−6%	32%	32%	23%	6%	9%	39%	−2%	40%	−21%	34%
Morning Consult	Dec 23–29, 2019	51%	56%	−8%	55%	15%	22%	35%	19%	5%	8%	32%	4%	31%	−3%	17%
YouGov/Economist	Dec 22–24, 2019	42%	48%	−40%	59%	−5%	28%	35%	19%	6%	6%	40%	−1%	48%	−21%	38%
Morning Consult	Dec 20–22, 2019	49%	55%	−12%	44%	17%	26%	33%	19%	4%	8%	34%	3%	28%	−5%	19%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Dec 19–20, 2019	45%	42.6%	42.9%	17.1%	27.6%	7.4%	22.3%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Dec 13–18, 2019	43.2%	40.5%	40.1%	11%	29.4%	4.2%	16.1%
YouGov/Economist	Dec 14–17, 2019	45%	47%	−21%	56%	−3%	26%	27%	15%	1%	9%	35%	−3%	38%	−17%	29%
CNN/SSRS	Dec 12–15, 2019	42%	54%	47%	32%
Morning Consult	Dec 9–15, 2019	49%	57%	−1%	44%	14%	21%	30%	15%	4%	10%	27%	4%	31%	−4%	17%
Echelon Insights	Dec 9–14, 2019	67%	56%	48%	14%	40%
YouGov/Economist	Dec 7–10, 2019	45%	49%	−19%	55%	−9%	25%	33%	5%	3%	5%	25%	−9%	41%	−17%	27%
Quinnipiac	Dec 4–9, 2019	56%	60%	54%	9%	32%	39%
Monmouth	Dec 4–8, 2019	56%	53%	61%	1%	35%	25%
Morning Consult	Dec 2–8, 2019	50%	57%	−5%	47%	13%	22%	32%	15%	4%	6%	28%	3%	32%	−5%	18%
YouGov/Economist	Dec 1–3, 2019	43%	48%	−19%	53%	−5%	23%	37%	8%	6%	11%	28%	−1%	43%	−18%	38%	37%	7%	−2%
Morning Consult	Nov 25 – Dec 1, 2019	50%	54%	−4%	42%	9%	20%	34%	14%	5%	8%	26%	1%	28%	−4%	17%	28%
YouGov/Economist	Nov 24–26, 2019	46%	51%	−17%	52%	−11%	29%	38%	8%	4%	12%	30%	5%	46%	−14%	31%	37%	8%	1%
Morning Consult	Nov 21–24, 2019	45%	56%	−6%	44%	1%	18%	35%	11%	1%	6%	28%	2%	32%	−5%	17%	32%	4%
Ipsos/Reuters	Nov 21–22, 2019	55%	68%	57%	3%	38%	−6%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Nov 20–21, 2019	44.5%	44%	−17%	48.7%	14.3%	37.3%	2.1%	16.9%	26.3%	25.9%
YouGov/Economist	Nov 17–19, 2019	50%	45%	−20%	59%	4%	28%	46%	10%	6%	13%	31%	0%	39%	−15%	31%	37%	8%	1%	−3%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Nov 14–18, 2019	47.9%	42.7%	−12.5%	46.2%	10.3%	34.4%	1.3%	12.4%	24.6%	24.8%
Morning Consult	Nov 11–17, 2019	52%	57%	0%	48%	5%	20%	34%	11%	4%	10%	24%	3%	31%	−6%	16%	29%	4%
Ipsos/Reuters	Nov 12–14, 2019	62%	67%	59%	15%	45%
YouGov/Economist	Nov 10–12, 2019	37%	52%	58%	6%	25%	38%	−2%	13%	−5%	29%	44%	−21%	30%	41%	−3%	−1%
Morning Consult	Nov 4–10, 2019	54%	56%	50%	25%	32%	−1%	3%	3%	13%	16%	36%	5%	−6%	22%
YouGov/Economist	Nov 3–5, 2019	42%	50%	−16%	64%	23%	39%	16%	9%	30%	−3%	37%	−13%	32%	36%	4%	3%	−2%
Change Research/Crooked Media	Oct 31 – Nov 3, 2019	42%	48%	63%	46%	35%
Monmouth	Oct 30 – Nov 3, 2019	57%	47%	70%	33%	33%
Morning Consult	Oct 28 – Nov 3, 2019	54%	56%	−1%	50%	22%	33%	13%	5%	25%	3%	32%	−6%	16%	36%	3%
YouGov/Kalikow School at Hofstra University	Oct 25–31, 2019	66.7%	69.6%	70.6%
YouGov/Economist	Oct 27–29, 2019	49%	51%	−13%	62%	21%	45%	5%	11%	30%	0%	39%	−17%	29%	37%	5%	−5%	−5%	35%
Morning Consult	Oct 21–27, 2019	55%	59%	−2%	53%	18%	35%	12%	8%	26%	4%	31%	−5%	15%	36%	6%	27%	5%
Echelon Insights	Oct 21–25, 2019	58%	53%	61%	43%	40%
YouGov/Economist	Oct 20–22, 2019	39%	53%	−8%	64%	24%	42%	12%	10%	27%	0%	43%	−16%	31%	38%	5%	−3%	0%	33%	1%
CNN/SSRS	Oct 17–20, 2019	54%	58%	50%	22%	39%	46%
Morning Consult	Oct 16–20, 2019	49%	56%	3%	54%	23%	36%	12%	5%	26%	5%	32%	−6%	19%	36%	5%	30%	5%
Ipsos/Reuters[ps]	Oct 17–18, 2019	66.91%	55.83%	9.59%	61.59%	25.38%	33.66%	14.9%	27.17%	36.13%	20.66%	40.64%	29.84%
Morning Consult	Oct 16, 2019	48%	55%	8%	51%	25%	43%	13%	11%	29%	5%	31%	−5%	19%	35%	5%	29%	9%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Oct 15–16, 2019	48.6%	45.3%	−6.7%	54.3%	15%	33.5%	2%	14.5%	25.3%	8.2%	28.4%	17%
YouGov/Economist	Oct 13–15, 2019	45%	48%	5%	63%	27%	43%	8%	12%	31%	1%	37%	−11%	31%	39%	9%	1%	−2%	37%	1%
Lord Ashcroft Polls	Oct 1-15, 2019[pt]	55.05%	58.30%	44.17%	4.93%	14.68%	13.71%	17.89%	28.58%	17.68%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Oct 7–14, 2019	47.4%	43.1%	2.2%	52.1%	11.8%	31%	−0.8%	14.2%	26.3%	11.6%	30.7%	22.6%
HarrisX	Oct 12–13, 2019	62%	44%	11%	53%	16%	34%	13%	21%	31%	20%	38%	31%
Quinnipiac	Oct 11–13, 2019	60%	54%	70%
Morning Consult	Oct 7–12, 2019	55%	57%	11%	51%	20%	33%	10%	4%	25%	3%	31%	−2%	16%	36%	5%	28%	3%
Fox News	Oct 6–8, 2019	58%	63%	63%	38%	35%	41%	34%
YouGov/Economist	Oct 6–8, 2019	40%	55%	0%	66%	23%	42%	7%	8%	33%	−3%	41%	−17%	27%	36%	8%	1%	0%	29%	3%
Morning Consult	Sep 30 – Oct 6, 2019	53%	55%	11%	54%	20%	34%	8%	9%	23%	0%	33%	−2%	17%	38%	3%	31%	5%
YouGov/Economist	Sep 28 – Oct 1, 2019	36%	37%	−1%	60%	25%	46%	9%	13%	32%	−1%	38%	−21%	29%	32%	8%	1%	−2%	35%	5%

Before October 2019

Favorability polling prior to October 2019

Poll source	Date(s) administered	Biden	Sanders	Gabbard	Warren	Bloomberg	Klobuchar	Buttigieg	Steyer	Bennet	Yang	Delaney	Booker	Williamson	Castro	Harris	Bullock	Sestak	Messam	O’Rourke	Ryan	de Blasio	Gillibrand	Moulton	Inslee	Hickenlooper	Gravel	Swalwell
Monmouth	Sep 23–29, 2019	52%	56%	66%	41%	25%	42%
Morning Consult	Sep 23–29, 2019	54%	54%	9%	52%	21%	35%	9%	8%	23%	2%	31%	−3%	14%	35%	3%	30%	4%
YouGov/Economist	Sep 22–24, 2019	46%	49%	10%	63%	20%	42%	9%	9%	32%	1%	34%	−8%	26%	40%	6%	2%	0%	33%	4%
Quinnipiac	Sep 19–23, 2019	53%	47%	64%	22%	39%	−1%	13%	31%	7%	34%	25%
Morning Consult	Sep 16–22, 2019	50%	53%	9%	52%	23%	34%	7%	7%	24%	4%	33%	−3%	8%	35%	4%	30%	3%
YouGov/Economist	Sep 14–17, 2019	41%	43%	33%	60%	23%	44%	2%	9%	24%	−5%	35%	−17%	8%	30%	2%	−6%	−8%	38%	−6%	−11%
HarrisX	Sep 14–16, 2019	64%	53%	49%	14%	35%	17%	33%	14%	37%	33%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Sep 12–16, 2019	47.1%	44.3%	52.9%	11.8%	35.8%	14.5%	29.4%	9.6%	32.5%	31.2%
Morning Consult	Sep 13–15, 2019	54%	59%	11%	52%	21%	33%	8%	6%	22%	3%	30%	−6%	11%	38%	6%	31%	1%	−4%
HarrisX	Sep 10–11, 2019	60%	58%	50%	24%	30%	27%	33%	27%	34%	34%
Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight	Sep 5–11, 2019	45.7%	44%	48.5%	8.1%	32.2%	14.8%	26.7%	19.8%	31.4%	23.9%
Ipsos/Reuters	Sep 9–10, 2019	72.9%	73.92%	16.52%	57.6%	24.48%	32.66%	15.08%	11.34%	26.98%	14.04%	34.5%	13.44%	22.94%	48.18%	10.4%	6.76%	5.76%	39.42%	16.43%	20.91%
YouGov/Economist	Sep 8–10, 2019	39%	46%	0%	61%	19%	42%	8%	12%	33%	−2%	35%	−15%	38%	42%	6%	0%	−6%	33%	−3%	−8%
NPR/PBS/Marist	Sep 5–8, 2019	49%	39%	64%	17%	41%	−1%	19%	38%	26%	39%	29%
Morning Consult	Sep 2–8, 2019	52%	57%	10%	49%	20%	36%	9%	10%	25%	5%	33%	−1%	21%	38%	7%	31%	2%	−2%
YouGov/FairVote	Sep 2–6, 2019	43%	45%	−4%	61%	15%	40%	−2%	5%	25%	−11%	31%	−20%	32%	38%	0%	−2%	−4%	29%	−5%	−22%
ABC/Washington Post	Sep 2–5, 2019	65%	70%	63%	41%	47%
YouGov/Economist	Sep 1–3, 2019	36%	50%	3%	60%	10%	30%	0%	8%	31%	−1%	34%	−10%	31%	39%	2%	−3%	−3%	34%	0%	−9%
Morning Consult	Aug 26 – Sep 1, 2019	52%	55%	11%	49%	20%	32%	9%	8%	22%	3%	31%	−1%	22%	38%	6%	34%	3%	−3%	20%
YouGov/Economist	Aug 24–27, 2019	48%	55%	12%	64%	29%	48%	8%	12%	32%	−3%	41%	−3%	42%	50%	7%	3%	1%	42%	−2%	−1%	26%
Morning Consult	Aug 19–25, 2019	56%	57%	13%	48%	20%	34%	11%	7%	23%	3%	31%	0%	23%	35%	7%	34%	6%	−1%	20%
Echelon Insights	Aug 19–21, 2019	59%	55%	42%	28%	43%
YouGov/Economist	Aug 17–20, 2019	40%	53%	2%	63%	14%	37%	6%	7%	22%	−8%	36%	−8%	33%	40%	6%	−5%	−4%	33%	−1%	−8%	12%	−3%	11%
Monmouth	Aug 16–20, 2019	41%	40%	52%	9%	29%	−16%	12%	35%	−11%	22%	39%	9%	−6%	19%
Morning Consult	Aug 12–18, 2019	52%	55%	10%	48%	19%	36%	10%	8%	23%	3%	34%	0%	23%	37%	6%	36%	6%	−2%	20%	0%	9%
HarrisX	Aug 14–15, 2019	51%	45%	25%	6%	4%	21%	0%	40%	10%	2%	3%	23%	−3%	8%
HarrisX	Aug 13–14, 2019	2%	46%	14%	6%	25%	17%	29%	8%	0%	9%
Fox News	Aug 11–13, 2019	66%	75%	71%	61%
YouGov/Economist	Aug 10–13, 2019	41%	39%	4%	60%	20%	45%	5%	12%	32%	1%	36%	−8%	34%	42%	9%	3%	−1%	44%	1%	−17%	20%	−3%	18%	5%
Morning Consult	Aug 5–11, 2019	57%	53%	12%	47%	20%	32%	11%	7%	21%	2%	29%	1%	21%	36%	7%	34%	6%	−4%	18%	3%	9%	9%
YouGov/Economist	Aug 3–6, 2019	39%	43%	4%	53%	20%	40%	4%	11%	23%	−3%	36%	−9%	31%	30%	6%	−3%	2%	28%	−1%	−8%	17%	−2%	16%	6%	−1%
Morning Consult	Aug 1–4, 2019	55%	52%	12%	46%	20%	33%	8%	8%	19%	2%	26%	0%	24%	30%	5%	23%	1%	−7%	17%	2%	9%	6%
Public Policy Polling	Aug 1–4, 2019	59%	36%	<7%	35%	12%	24%	<7%	7%	9%	<7%	27%	<7%	20%	26%	<7%	<7%	<7%	13%	<7%	<7%	<7%	<7%	<7%	<7%	<7%
YouGov/Economist[pu]	Jul 27–30, 2019	47%	45%	2%	65%	22%	43%	5%	−2%	16%	−2%	39%	−4%	39%	48%	11%	−1%	5%	30%	−14%	−5%	9%	−2%	17%	3%	−2%
HarrisX	Jul 28–29, 2019	61%	38%	30%	18%	9%	18%	8%	43%	10%	13%	12%	22%	14%	12%	13%
HarrisX	Jul 27–28, 2019	11%	49%	15%	10%	29%	22%	27%	14%	9%	8%	9%
Morning Consult	Jul 22–28, 2019	56%	52%	9%	45%	21%	33%	9%	7%	15%	3%	30%	−3%	23%	41%	5%	27%	4%	−5%	21%	3%	9%	9%
Democracy Corps	Jul 18–28, 2019	51%	43%	31%	39%
Echelon Insights	Jul 23–27, 2019	59%	57%	46%	38%	50%
YouGov/Economist[pv]	Jul 21–23, 2019	47%	43%	2%	55%	30%	41%	9%	14%	14%	5%	42%	−5%	41%	48%	11%	6%	3%	36%	4%	3%	21%	8%	20%	15%	6%
Morning Consult	Jul 15–21, 2019	54%	51%	11%	45%	20%	33%	7%	9%	14%	5%	31%	−2%	21%	44%	5%	26%	4%	−3%	22%	2%	8%	8%
YouGov/Economist	Jul 14–16, 2019	51%	46%	3%	59%	29%	39%	6%	10%	12%	4%	48%	−7%	39%	54%	6%	4%	0%	33%	9%	4%	22%	2%	18%	10%	4%
Morning Consult	Jul 8–14, 2019	51%	52%	7%	46%	16%	34%	5%	12%	2%	30%	−7%	24%	40%	4%	25%	2%	−4%	18%	0%	7%	8%	5%
Gallup	Jul 1–12, 2019	52%	55%	46%	18%	33%	31%	21%	43%	18%	1%
YouGov/Economist	Jul 7–9, 2019	47%	41%	6%	55%	24%	40%	10%	4%	−2%	35%	−16%	35%	49%	6%	1%	−6%	28%	4%	1%	20%	−1%	11%	3%	1%	9%
Morning Consult	Jul 1–7, 2019	56%	57%	7%	50%	20%	35%	6%	12%	3%	30%	−2%	25%	41%	4%	26%	3%	−3%	13%	9%	9%	5%	6%
YouGov/Economist	Jun 30 – Jul 2, 2019	47%	43%	10%	58%	31%	43%	13%	15%	7%	49%	−11%	47%	59%	12%	4%	3%	32%	10%	2%	27%	6%	21%	14%	1%	17%
CNN/SSRS	Jun 28–30, 2019	51%	49%	52%	37%	26%	34%	50%
Morning Consult/FiveThirtyEight	Jun 26–30, 2019	54.8%	57.8%	9.1%	60.8%	23.1%	37.6%	7.2%	13.5%	3%	40.4%	−4.8%	35.4%	54.1%	24.2%	5.1%	−1.7%	19.6%	7.2%	4%	7.3%
HarrisX	Jun 28–29, 2019	51%	45%	26%	3%	−4%	−4%	40%	4%	−6%	−6%	16%	−4%	−4%	−1%	10%
HarrisX	Jun 27–28, 2019	12%	52%	18%	9%	32%	32%	29%	17%	7%	17%
Morning Consult	Jun 27–28, 2019	50%	44%	4%	51%	19%	37%	6%	10%	1%	33%	−1%	25%	41%	7%	20%	4%	−6%	15%	1%	4%	10%	4%
HarrisX	Jun 26–27, 2019	63%	49%	32%	8%	17%	8%	42%	7%	6%	6%	24%	4%	−8%	8%	11%
HarrisX	Jun 25–26, 2019	10%	42%	22%	12%	30%	19%	40%	14%	2%	11%
Morning Consult/FiveThirtyEight	Jun 19–26, 2019	60.4%	56.7%	5.8%	49.9%	19.9%	35.2%	8.6%	15.2	6.8%	33.9%	4.2%	20%	44.9%	35.9%	7.7%	−2.1%	21%	9.1%	7.5%	9.8%
YouGov/Economist	Jun 22–25, 2019	56%	50%	2%	56%	28%	39%	11%	16%	8%	43%	10%	30%	47%	9%	4%	42%	7%	−2%	27%	5%	15%	10%	4%	17%
Echelon Insights	Jun 22–25, 2019	64%	53%	46%	33%	40%
Morning Consult	Jun 17–23, 2019	60%	57%	6%	44%	22%	32%	6%	13%	4%	29%	4%	18%	37%	7%	32%	4%	−2%	19%	4%	7%	9%	7%
YouGov/Economist	Jun 16–18, 2019	48%	43%	4%	54%	25%	43%	12%	14%	5%	45%	3%	26%	47%	8%	5%	40%	5%	−4%	26%	3%	15%	10%	3%	19%
Morning Consult	Jun 10–16, 2019	62%	56%	6%	45%	20%	33%	10%	13%	6%	34%	6%	18%	40%	7%	34%	5%	0%	22%	3%	11%	9%	10%
WPA Intelligence (R)	Jun 10–13, 2019	71%	55%	57%	48%	49%	63%	50%
YouGov/Economist	Jun 9–11, 2019	47%	39%	−3%	49%	16%	42%	7%	7%	3%	36%	−2%	24%	45%	4%	−2%	32%	9%	−7%	24%	0%	13%	−1%	−1%	9%
Morning Consult	Jun 3–9, 2019	62%	55%	7%	43%	20%	31%	7%	11%	6%	33%	6%	17%	40%	6%	33%	9%	−2%	21%	4%	10%	8%	9%
YouGov/Economist	Jun 2–4, 2019	54%	47%	0%	55%	26%	42%	10%	13%	3%	47%	3%	30%	54%	6%	2%	38%	9%	7%	26%	7%	16%	11%	−1%	21%
Morning Consult	May 27 – Jun 2, 2019	61%	55%	4%	40%	19%	32%	4%	10%	4%	31%	3%	16%	38%	3%	33%	5%	0%	18%	4%	6%	5%	6%
CNN/SSRS	May 28–31, 2019	65%	61%	52%	33%	3%	43%	−2%	−3%
Morning Consult	May 20–26, 2019	62%	57%	5%	36%	19%	29%	4%	10%	5%	32%	3%	15%	40%	4%	35%	1%	0%	22%	2%	9%	7%	8%
Echelon Insights	May 20–21, 2019	72%	53%	38%	33%	43%
Change Research	May 18–21, 2019	48%	50%	7%	67%	20%	14%	2%	38%	1%	25%	56%	0%	40%	0%	−7%	18%	1%	12%	5%	13%
Monmouth	May 16–20, 2019	57%	44%	7%	46%	22%	24%	11%	−1%	1%	28%	0%	18%	49%	0%	−6%	21%	0%	−9%	11%	2%	9%	11%	−5%	11%
Quinnipiac	May 16–20, 2019	65%	50%	−2%	45%	20%	34%	7%	3%	5%	36%	3%	19%	46%	2%	0%	21%	2%	−22%	14%	−3%	12%	6%	8%
Morning Consult	May 13–19, 2019	62%	58%	5%	41%	18%	31%	5%	9%	5%	33%	3%	15%	37%	4%	36%	4%	1%	18%	2%	7%	7%	7%
Morning Consult	May 6–12, 2019	63%	57%	6%	36%	16%	31%	5%	10%	5%	31%	17%	38%	1%	31%	0%	6%	19%	1%	8%	7%	8%
Morning Consult	Apr 29 – May 5, 2019	61%	55%	6%	40%	19%	29%	7%	4%	31%	15%	38%	3%	31%	2%	18%	1%	7%	7%
Gallup	Apr 17–30, 2019	60%	57%	40%	30%	31%	42%	26%
CNN/SSRS	Apr 25–28, 2019	69%	26%	3%	14%	−5%	3%
Morning Consult	Apr 22–28, 2019	62%	58%	5%	39%	16%	27%	8%	5%	32%	16%	37%	2%	33%	2%	18%	2%	8%	8%
Morning Consult	Apr 15–21, 2019	61%	59%	5%	36%	15%	29%	10%	5%	32%	16%	37%	3%	36%	3%	18%	10%	7%
Change Research	Apr 12–15, 2019	56%	45%	7%	52%	22%	52%	6%	8%	2%	43%	2%	31%	51%	0%	49%	2%	15%	9%	5%	14%
Echelon Insights	April 17–19, 2019	54%	62%	24%	27%	32%
Monmouth	Apr 11–15, 2019	56%	44%	32%	14%	29%	24%	40%	31%
Morning Consult	Apr 8–14, 2019	60%	58%	5%	35%	16%	23%	10%	4%	31%	16%	36%	4%	35%	1%	16%	8%	9%
Morning Consult	Apr 1–7, 2019	60%	57%	6%	35%	19%	20%	5%	3%	33%	14%	34%	3%	35%	0%	19%	6%	7%
Morning Consult	Mar 25–31, 2019	67%	63%	5%	37%	18%	14%	4%	31%	15%	36%	3%	32%	20%	8%	8%
Morning Consult	Mar 18–24, 2019	68%	60%	5%	34%	15%	11%	3%	33%	14%	36%	2%	33%	18%	7%	7%
CNN/SSRS	Mar 14–17, 2019	60%	13%	33%	36%	8%	5%
Morning Consult	Mar 11–17, 2019	65%	60%	5%	38%	15%	8%	3%	28%	17%	35%	3%	34%	18%	7%	6%
Change Research	Mar 8–10, 2019	71%	53%	62%	49%	57%
Morning Consult	Mar 4–10, 2019	68%	60%	5%	36%	15%	6%	3%	30%	13%	40%	2%	36%	18%	5%	4%
Monmouth	Mar 1–4, 2019	63%	53%	30%	1%	13%	6%	31%	4%	42%	0%	26%	−6%	7%
Morning Consult	Feb 25 – Mar 3, 2019	68%	60%	5%	35%	10%	15%	6%	3%	31%	13%	41%	2%	35%	18%	5%	4%
Gallup	Feb 12–28, 2019	71%	35%	21%	33%	42%	22%
Morning Consult	Feb 18–24, 2019	64%	60%	4%	37%	10%	18%	5%	4%	28%	15%	35%	2%	33%	17%	2%	5%
Morning Consult	Feb 11–17, 2019	67%	61%	3%	39%	13%	22%	5%	2%	34%	15%	40%	3%	32%	21%	2%	4%
Morning Consult	Feb 4–10, 2019	69%	57%	2%	34%	12%	15%	4%	3%	31%	13%	41%	1%	31%	18%	5%	5%
Morning Consult/Politico	Feb 1–2, 2019	74%	61%	43%	18%	38%	43%	37%
CNN/SSRS	Jan 30 – Feb 2, 2019	2%	41%	4%	16%	43%	15%
Morning Consult/Politico	Jan 25–27, 2019	69%	55%	45%	12%	3%	26%	41%	26%
Monmouth	Jan 25–27, 2019	71%	49%	12%	40%	10%	15%	2%	0%	9%	33%	15%	33%	32%	16%	3%	4%
Morning Consult/Politico	Jan 18–22, 2019	66%	58%	46%	15%	30%	38%	33%	22%
HarrisX	Jan 15–16, 2019	3%	12%	9%
Morning Consult/Politico	Jan 11–14, 2019	68%	57%	39%	15%	30%	35%	29%
NPR/PBS/Marist	Jan 10–13, 2019	64%	29%	36%	0%	13%	30%	13%	26%	29%	8%
Morning Consult/Politico	Jan 4–6, 2019	71%	59%	33%	8%	26%	27%	30%
HarrisX	Jan 3–4, 2019	64%	52%	48%	7%	21%	20%	45%	22%	37%	38%	25%
Change Research	Dec 14–17, 2018	80%	65%	20%	61%	20%	28%	4%	50%	27%	53%	63%	14%
Quinnipiac	Dec 12–17, 2018	77%	61%	48%	17%	41%	37%	41%	21%
CNN/SSRS	Dec 6–9, 2018	66%	64%	38%	30%	31%	34%
Morning Consult/Politico	Nov 7–9, 2018	32%
GQR Research	Jul 21–26, 2018	53%	57%	34%
RABA Research	Jan 10–11, 2018	72%	57%	53%
Public Policy Polling	Dec 3–6, 2016	67%	67%	46%	19%	0%	9%

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries.

• Statewide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries
• 2020 Democratic National Convention
• Opinion polling for the 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries
• Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 United States presidential election
• Statewide opinion polling for the 2020 United States presidential election

Notes

Partisan clients

1. ^ ^{a b c} By the time of this poll, Data for Progress, which has worked with both the Sanders and Warren campaigns, had endorsed Warren.
2. ^ By the time of the sampling period, Data for Progress had endorsed the Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign.
3. ^ Poll sponsored by Club for Growth Action.

Additional candidates

1. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r} Key:
   A – all adults
   RV – registered voters
   LV – likely voters
   V – unclear
2. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Additional data sourced from fivethirtyeight.com
3. ^ Democratic subsample not yet released
4. ^ “Likely Democratic” sample not yet released
5. ^ “The Democrats should probably or definitely select another nominee” with 26%
6. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j} 67% (rounded to the nearest integer) of a sample of 1000 RVs
7. ^ Listed as “did not vote” in the context of polling a sample of primary voters including those in states with primaries that had already been held before the sampling period
8. ^ Andrew Cuomo with 19%; “someone else” with 11%
9. ^ “Neither” [Biden nor Sanders] with 3%, reported separately from “Other” with 2%
10. ^ Warren with 7%; Someone else with 1%
11. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j k l} not reported
12. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p} Not yet released
13. ^ “Someone else” with 5%
14. ^ ^{a b} via 538.com
15. ^ not polled separately
16. ^ includes Tulsi Gabbard
17. ^ “Someone else” with 1%
18. ^ “Someone else” with 2%
19. ^ Patrick with 0.5%; Bennet with 0.4%; Delaney with 0.2%
20. ^ Bennet with 1%; Patrick with 0%
21. ^ ^{a b} Bennet and Patrick with 1%; someone else with 1%
22. ^ Patrick with 1%; someone else with 1%
23. ^ ^{a b} Bennet with 1%; someone else with 1%
24. ^ ^{a b} Bennet with 1%
25. ^ Bennet with 2%; Patrick and “someone else” with 1%
26. ^ ^{a b} 5% for all other candidates combined
27. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%
28. ^ Bennet and Gabbard with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with no voters; “someone else” with 3%; refused with 2%
29. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Delaney with 0%; other with 3%; would not vote with 2%
30. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Patrick with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, “none” and other with no voters
31. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Patrick with 1%; Bennet and Delaney with 0%; would not vote with 1%
32. ^ Support for Steyer, Yang, and all candidates listed in ‘other’ is estimated as the proportion of voters who support them plus (the proportion of undecided voters who lean towards them * the proportion of voters who are undecided)
33. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Bennet with 0%; other with 2%
34. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, and Patrick with 0%
35. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with 0%; none of these with 1%
36. ^ Bennet, Delaney and Gabbard with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
37. ^ If only Biden, Sanders and Warren remained candidates
38. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%
39. ^ Bennet, Delaney and Gabbard with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 2%
40. ^ Bennet with 2%; Gabbard with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%
41. ^ Likely voter total used here is Democrats and Democratic-leaning registered voters listed as ‘absolutely certain to vote’
42. ^ Bennet with 2%; Patrick with 1%; Gabbard with 0%; other with 1%; “none of these” with 2%; would not vote with no voters
43. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with 1%; “someone else” with 0%; would not vote with 12%
44. ^ Bennet and Gabbard with 2%; Delaney and Patrick with 1%; other with 2%
45. ^ Patrick with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, and Gabbard with 0%; None of these with 1%
46. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with 0%; would not vote with 1%
47. ^ Bennet and Gabbard with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%; Others with 1%; no one with 1%
48. ^ “No one” with 2%; Other with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gabbard and Patrick with 0%
49. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet and Delaney with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
50. ^ Booker with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Harris, O’Rourke, Patrick and Williamson with no voters; “Other response” with 12%
51. ^ ^{a b} Listed as “no response”; see the “Other” column for other potentially undecided voters
52. ^ Gabbard with 2%; someone else with 2%
53. ^ Bennet with 2%; Patrick with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard and other with 0%; can’t/won’t vote with 0%
54. ^ Gabbard with 2%; other with 1%
55. ^ Bennet with 2%; Delaney and Gabbard with 1%; Patrick with 0%; other with 1%
56. ^ Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with 0%; would not vote with 2%
57. ^ Bennet, Booker, Gabbard, and Patrick with 1%; Delaney with 0%; wouldn’t vote with 1%; someone else with 0%
58. ^ Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bennet and Delaney with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
59. ^ Gabbard, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Booker with 0%; Delaney and Patrick with no voters; someone else with 3%; refused with 1%
60. ^ Booker with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Gabbard and Patrick with 0%; other with 1%; would not vote with no voters
61. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Booker with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 2%
62. ^ Booker & Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Delaney & Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
63. ^ Castro with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Patrick, and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 2%
64. ^ Bennet and Castro with 1%; Delaney, Patrick, Williamson and “someone else” with 0%; would not vote with 12%
65. ^ Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand and Messam with 1%; Gravel, Swalwell and Williamson with 0%; Ryan with no voters; other and would not vote with 1%
66. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney, and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
67. ^ Castro with 2%; Williamson with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%; other with 1%
68. ^ Castro, Delaney, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%; would not vote with 2%
69. ^ Castro with 2%; Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Bennet with 0%
70. ^ ^{a b} Bennet, Castro, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
71. ^ Castro and Delaney with 1%; Bennet, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; other with 1%; can’t/won’t vote with 5%
72. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%
73. ^ Delaney with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Patrick, and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 3%
74. ^ Castro with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Patrick, and Williamson with 0%; no one with 1%
75. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Delaney, and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; “would not vote” with 1%
76. ^ Castro with 2%; Delaney with 1%; Bennet with 0%; Patrick and Williamson without voters; no one with 2%; someone else with 1%
77. ^ Castro with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Patrick, and Williamson with 0%
78. ^ Castro with 4%; Delaney and Patrick with 2%; Bennet with 1%; Williamson with 0%
79. ^ “refused” with 1%, Patrick with 0%
80. ^ Castro with 2%; Delaney with 1%; Bennet, Patrick and Williamson with 0%
81. ^ Bennet and Castro with 1%; Williamson with 0%; Delaney and Patrick with no voters; someone else with 3%; refused with 5%
82. ^ Data not yet released for this sample for Booker, Castro and Williamson
83. ^ Patrick with 1%; Bennet with 0%; other with 2%; can’t/won’t vote with 3%
84. ^ Castro and Bennet with 1%; Patrick, Williamson, and “other” with <1%, Delaney with no votes
85. ^ Bennet, Castro, and Williamson with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%; “none of the above” with 2%
86. ^ Bennet and Castro with 1%; would not vote with 2%
87. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney, and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with no voters; would not vote with 1%
88. ^ someone else with 3%
89. ^ Castro and Patrick with 1%; Williamson with <1%; Bennet and Delaney with 0%; other with <1%; no one with 3%
90. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; “Someone else” with 1%
91. ^ Castro, Delaney, and Patrick with 1%; Bennet with 0%; others with 2%; will not vote with 4%
92. ^ Harris with 4%; Bennet, Castro, Patrick and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, and Sestak with 0%; would not vote with 1%
93. ^ Castro and Harris with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney and Patrick with 1%; Sestak and Williamson with 0%
94. ^ Harris with 5%; Castro and Patrick with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Sestak and Williamson with <1%; Delaney with 0%; other with 1%
95. ^ Harris with 5%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 2%
96. ^ Steyer with 2%; Booker, Delaney, Gabbard, Gravel and Swalwell with 1%; Castro, Gillibrand, Messam and Williamson with 0%; Ryan with no voters; other with 0%; will not vote with 2%
97. ^ Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Patrick, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet and Sestak with 0%; would not vote with 2%
98. ^ Bennet, Booker and Castro with 2%; Gabbard with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Patrick, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 0%, Wouldn’t vote with 1%
99. ^ Steyer with 3%; Booker with 2%; Castro with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Patrick, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 1%; no one with 3%
100. ^ If only Biden, Buttigieg, Sanders and Warren remained as candidates
101. ^ no one 3%
102. ^ Booker, Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 2%
103. ^ Steyer with 2%; Castro, Gabbard, and Patrick with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 3%
104. ^ Booker and Steyer with 2%; Castro, Gabbard and Patrick with 1%; others with 2%
105. ^ Booker, Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Castro with 1%; others with 2%
106. ^ Booker, Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, and Patrick with 1%; Castro, Delaney, Sestak and Williamson with 0%
107. ^ Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Booker, Castro and Sestak with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 3%
108. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Booker, Castro, Patrick and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Steyer with 0%
109. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Booker, Bullock, and Steyer with 1%; Castro, Delaney, Messam, Patrick, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 3%
110. ^ Booker, Castro, Steyer, and Williamson with 2%; Gabbard with 1%
111. ^ Castro and Delaney with 2%; Bennet, Booker, Gabbard, Patrick and Steyer with 1%
112. ^ Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%
113. ^ Bennet, Booker, Bullock, Castro, Gabbard and Steyer with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%; will not vote with 6%
114. ^ Booker with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Gabbard and Steyer with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%; will not vote with 6%
115. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 2%; Booker, Bullock, Delaney and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 1%
116. ^ Booker with 3%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; someone else with 2%
117. ^ Data not yet released for this sample for Booker, Bullock, Castro, Harris, Messam, Sestak and Williamson
118. ^ Gabbard and Steyer with 1%; Bennet with 0%; other with 3%; can’t/won’t vote with 6%
119. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 3%; Booker with 2%; Bullock, Delaney, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Messam and Sestak with 0%; will not vote with 2%
120. ^ Bennet, Booker, Castro, O’Rourke and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Messam and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%; will not vote with 5%
121. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Booker, O’Rourke and Steyer with 1%; Castro with 0%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with no voters
122. ^ Booker with 3%; Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Bullock and Williamson with <%1; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard and Sestak with 0%; “no one” with 1%; other with 1%
123. ^ Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; someone else with 2%
124. ^ O’Rourke with 2%; Booker, Gabbard, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Ryan and Sestak with 0%
125. ^ Booker and Castro with 2%; Bullock, Bennet, Delaney, Gabbard, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 1%
126. ^ ^{a b} Democrats only
127. ^ Gillibrand, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Castro, Gravel, Messam and Swalwell with 0%; Delaney with no voters; not planning on voting with 2%; other with 0%
128. ^ Bennet, Castro, and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
129. ^ Castro, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan and Sestak with 0%; someone else with 1%; refused with 1%
130. ^ Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro with 0%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak, and Williamson with no voters; “none of these” with 1%; other with 0%
131. ^ Bloomberg with 6%; other with 32%
132. ^ Bennet and Castro with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%; “none of these” with 1%; other with 0%
133. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Steyer with 1%; Bullock and Williamson with <0.5%; “none of these” with 2%; other with 1%; would not vote with 1%
134. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 2%
135. ^ Castro and Williamson with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, and Steyer with 1%
136. ^ ^{a b} Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan, Steyer, Williamson and someone else with 1%
137. ^ Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Messam and Sestak with 0%; Bullock and Delaney with no voters; refused with 1%
138. ^ Bullock, Ryan and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%
139. ^ Bennet, Castro, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 1%; Delaney, Bullock, and Williamson with 0%; “Other” with 1%
140. ^ Bennet, Castro, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam and Sestak with 0%; “would not vote” with 3%
141. ^ Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Messam, and Steyer with 0%
142. ^ Castro, Ryan and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Sestak and Steyer with 0%; Bennet with no votes; “someone else” with 1%; “Do not plan to vote in the Democratic primary” with 11%
143. ^ Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; “Someone else” with 2%
144. ^ Castro and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 1%
145. ^ Bennet, Ryan, and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
146. ^ Castro and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Messam, and Ryan with 0%; can’t/won’t vote with 3%; other with 2%
147. ^ Bullock, Castro, and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; other and would not vote with 0%
148. ^ Steyer with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan, Williamson and someone else with 1%
149. ^ Castro and Steyer with 1%; “some other Democrat” with 1%
150. ^ Bennet, Delaney, and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
151. ^ Steyer with 2%; Bennet and Castro with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with less than 0.5%
152. ^ Castro and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 0%; refused with 1%
153. ^ ^{a b} Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; someone else with 2%
154. ^ Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Moulton, Ryan and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Gravel and Messam with 0%
155. ^ Bennet, Castro, and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; other and would not vote with 0%
156. ^ Delaney with 2%; Castro, Ryan, and Williamson with 1%
157. ^ Bennet, Castro, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bullock with less than 0.5%; Delaney, Messam and Sestak with 0%
158. ^ Bullock with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Ryan and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; “would not vote” with 2%
159. ^ Steyer with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Ryan and Williamson with 1%; Delaney, Messam and other with 0%; Bullock and Sestak with no voters
160. ^ Bennet, Castro and Ryan with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 1%
161. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h} The result for this listing has not yet been released for the poll in question.
162. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet with 1%; Steyer with 0%; others and undecided with 14%
163. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Messam, Ryan and Steyer with 1%; Delaney, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 0%
164. ^ Delaney with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
165. ^ Castro and “Someone else” with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Messam, Ryan and Steyer with 0%; Delaney, Sestak and Williamson with no voters
166. ^ Castro with 2%; Bullock, Delaney, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; “someone else” with 1%; Sestak with 0%; Bennet with no votes; “Do not plan to vote in the Democratic primary” with 15%
167. ^ Bennet with 2%; Castro and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; would not vote with 3%
168. ^ Gabbard with 4%; Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, and Sestak with 0%
169. ^ Bennet, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
170. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Someone else with 2%
171. ^ Williamson with 2%; Castro, Klobuchar and Steyer with 1%; Bennet and Ryan with 0%; Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard and Sestak with less than 1%
172. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Messam and someone else with 0%; would not vote with 1%
173. ^ Ryan with 2%; Klobuchar, Castro, and Steyer with 1%
174. ^ Steyer with 2%; Castro, Gabbard and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%; won’t vote with 3%
175. ^ Castro and Steyer with 2%; Gabbard and Klobuchar with 1%; Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Messam, Ryan and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%; “won’t vote” with 3%
176. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Messam, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 0%
177. ^ Castro with 2%; Gabbard, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Klobuchar, Messam, and Steyer with 0%; “Someone else” with 2%
178. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet and Gabbard with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
179. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Messam and Sestak with 0%; someone else with 1%
180. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Someone else with 2%
181. ^ “Other” with 1%; Castro with 3%; Klobuchar with 2%; Gabbard, Bennet, Delaney, Steyer, Messam, and Ryan with 1%; Sestak, Bullock and Williamson with 0%
182. ^ Castro, Gabbard, Klobuchar and Williamson with 1%; Messam, Sestak and Steyer with 0%; can’t/won’t vote with 6%; other with 3%
183. ^ Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer with 1%; Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with 0%
184. ^ Gabbard, Bullock, Klobuchar, Williamson, and Steyer with 1%
185. ^ Klobuchar with 3%; “Someone else” and Castro with 2%
186. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Delaney and Steyer with 1%; Williamson with 0%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Messam, Ryan and Sestak with less than 0.5%
187. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Klobuchar, Castro, Bennet, Williamson, Bullock and Delaney with 1%; de Blasio, Steyer, Ryan, Messam and Sestak with 0%
188. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Gabbard, Delaney, Steyer, Bennet, de Blasio and Castro with 1%; Bullock, Ryan and Williamson with less than 0.5%
189. ^ “Some Other Democrat”, Castro and Klobuchar with 1%
190. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Klobuchar, Steyer with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Ryan and Williamson with 0%
191. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet and de Blasio with 0%; Someone else with 1%
192. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Messam with 0%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with no voters; “Other response” with 13%
193. ^ Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Sestak and Steyer with 1%; Messam, and Williamson and someone else with 0%; would not vote with 0%
194. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro, Klobuchar, Ryan and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Delaney and Steyer with 0%
195. ^ Klobuchar and Gabbard with 2%; “Other”, Castro, Williamson and Ryan with 1%; Bennet with 0%; de Blasio, Delaney, Steyer, Bullock, Messam and Sestak with less than 0.5%
196. ^ “Other” with 2%; Gabbard, Klobuchar, Steyer, Castro and Ryan with 1%; Williamson, Sestak, Bullock, Messam, de Blasio and Bennet with 0%
197. ^ Castro and Williamson with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Messam, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
198. ^ Castro, Gabbard and Williamson with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Klobuchar and Ryan with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
199. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Delaney and Sestak with less than 0.5%; “Someone else” with 1%
200. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Sestak, Steyer, and Other with 1%; de Blasio, Messam, Ryan, Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 2%
201. ^ Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock with 0%; Someone else with 2%
202. ^ Gabbard and Klobuchar with 1%; Castro with 0%; others with 2%
203. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Messam and Sestak and with 0%
204. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak and someone else with 0%; would not vote with 1%
205. ^ de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with less than 0.5%, Other with less than 0.5%
206. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Castro and de Blasio with 2%; Bennet, Delaney, Messam, Ryan and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Klobuchar, Sestak and Steyer with 0%
207. ^ Bullock, Castro, DeBlasio, Klobuchar, Gabbard, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Sestak and “someone else” with 0%; “Do not plan to vote in the Democratic primary” with 11%
208. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%, de Blasio with 0%; Someone else with 1%
209. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, Sestak, and Steyer with 1%; Messam with 0%
210. ^ “Someone else”, Klobuchar and Castro with 1%; Williamson, Gabbard, Bennet, Inslee, and Hickenlooper with 0%; Ryan, de Blasio, Delaney, Bullock, Gillibrand, Moulton, Messam, Sestak and Steyer with less than 0.5%
211. ^ Other with 6%; Klobuchar with 2%; Williamson & Castro with 1%; Steyer with 0%
212. ^ Gabbard, Klobuchar, Castro, Steyer, Delaney and other with 1%; Williamson, Gillibrand, Messam, and Ryan with 0%
213. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Klobuchar, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Delaney, Gillibrand, Messam, and Sestak with 0%
214. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%; Someone else with 1%
215. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 2%; Klobuchar, Williamson and Steyer with 1%; Delaney, Bennet, de Blasio, Sestak, Bullock and Gillibrand with 0%
216. ^ Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
217. ^ Castro and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Messam, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
218. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1% or less; Someone else with 2%
219. ^ Bullock with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Messam, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, and Sestak with 0%
220. ^ Steyer with 2%; Klobuchar, Gabbard, de Blasio, and Bullock with 1%
221. ^ Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Messam, Moulton and Sestak with 0%
222. ^ Gabbard with 1%; Castro, Klobuchar, Gillibrand, Bennet, Delaney, de Blasio, Bullock, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, Williamson, Messam and Moulton with 0%
223. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Gillibrand, and Inslee with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 0%
224. ^ Castro and Williamson with 2%; de Blasio, Gabbard, Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Gillibrand, Delaney, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
225. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; Others with 2%
226. ^ Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Inslee and Moulton with 0%; Someone else with 2%
227. ^ Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Steyer with 1%; Bullock, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
228. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; “other” with 1%; Messam and Sestak with 0%; Bennet, Bullock, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, and Ryan with less than 0.5%
229. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Klobuchar, Castro, Gillibrand, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan and Sestak with 0%
230. ^ Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Moulton, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with <1%; others with 2%
231. ^ Bullock, Castro, Klobuchar and Williamson with 2%; Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, and Moulton with 0%
232. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Moulton, and Sestak with 0%
233. ^ Castro with 2%; Williamson, Klobuchar, and Bennet with 0%
234. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Inslee, and Steyer with 1%; Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
235. ^ Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
236. ^ Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%
237. ^ Castro, Gabbard, and Klobuchar with 1%; Gillibrand, Inslee, Hickenlooper, Delaney, Williamson, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gravel, Sestak and Steyer with 0%
238. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Gillibrand, Moulton, Hickenlooper, Ryan, Williamson, Inslee, Steyer, Gravel, Bennet, de Blasio and Delaney with 0%
239. ^ Bennet and Klobuchar with 2%
240. ^ Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton with 0%; others with 1%
241. ^ “Other” with 7%; Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; de Blasio, Messam, Moulton and Sestak with 0%; Williamson, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Steyer, Bullock, Bennet, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan and Delaney with less than 0.5%
242. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; de Blasio, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Moulton, Messam, and Sestak with 0%
243. ^ Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Moulton with 0%; others with 1%
244. ^ Castro, Gravel, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Steyer with 1%; Bloomberg, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
245. ^ Gabbard, Klobuchar, Inslee and Ryan with 1%; others with 3%
246. ^ Booker with 3%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Inslee, Klobuchar, Steyer, Williamson and Yang with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Moulton and Ryan with 0%; others with 2%
247. ^ Booker, Castro, and Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
248. ^ Steyer and Yang with 2%; de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Gabbard, and Gillibrand with 1%; Bennet, Booker, Bullock, Gravel, Inslee, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
249. ^ Castro and Steyer with 2%; Bennet, Booker, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
250. ^ Booker, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
251. ^ Yang with 2%; Booker, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Steyer with 0%
252. ^ Booker with 3%; Yang with 2%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, Steyer, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Klobuchar, Messam, and Moulton with <1%
253. ^ Booker with 3%; Yang with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Moulton, Ryan, Steyer and Williamson with <1%; others with 2%
254. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Booker, Gabbard, Gillibrand, and Yang with 1%; Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Bennet, and Ryan with 0%; others with 1%
255. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Booker, Bullock, Castro, Gillibrand, and Yang with 1%; others with 2%
256. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 3%; Gabbard with 2%; Booker, Castro, Gillibrand, and Gravel with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
257. ^ Booker, Castro, de Blasio, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with 0%
258. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 3%; Booker and Hickenlooper with 2%; Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, and Steyer with 1%; Moulton and Sestak with 0%; Bennet, Bullock, Gabbard, Inslee, Messam, Ryan and Williamson with less than 0.5%
259. ^ Castro with 3%; Booker, Gabbard, and Yang with 2%; de Blasio, Bullock, Klobuchar, and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
260. ^ Booker and Yang with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Steyer, Moulton and Williamson with <1%; others with 2%
261. ^ Booker with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Moulton, Ryan, Steyer, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Gabbard, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
262. ^ Booker with 3%; de Blasio with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Steyer, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%
263. ^ Booker with 3%; Castro and Yang with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, and Sestak with 0%
264. ^ Booker and Yang with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Swalwell, Moulton and Williamson with <1%; others with 2%
265. ^ Booker, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Sestak, Steyer, Williamson, and Yang with 0%; others with 1%
266. ^ Yang with 2%; Bennet, Booker, Castro, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar and Williamson with 1%; others with 0%
267. ^ Booker, Castro and Gabbard with 2%; Bullock, de Blasio, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
268. ^ Yang with 3%; Booker and Gabbard with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Gravel, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Swalwell with 1%; de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%
269. ^ Booker with 3%; Gabbard with 2%; Yang and Castro with 1%
270. ^ Booker with 2%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Inslee, and Moulton with 0%; others with 2%
271. ^ Booker and Castro with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, and Klobuchar with 1%; Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with 0%
272. ^ Yang with 2%; Booker, Bullock, Castro, Gillibrand, and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
273. ^ Booker and Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
274. ^ Booker and Castro with 2%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, and Sestak with 0%; others with 0%
275. ^ Castro with 4%; Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Booker, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Yang and Williamson with 1%; de Blasio, Delaney, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with less than 0.5%
276. ^ Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Booker, Bullock, de Blasio, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, and Swalwell with 0%
277. ^ Booker with 3%; Castro, Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; others with <1%
278. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; Bullock and Messam with 0%; others with 2%
279. ^ Castro with 2%; Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 0%
280. ^ Castro with 1.7%; Yang with 0.8%; Klobuchar and Gabbard with 0.6%; Bennet and Gillibrand with 0.5%; Delaney and Hickenlooper with 0.4%; Ryan with 0.3%; de Blasio and Inslee with 0.2%; Swalwell and Williamson with 0.1%; others with 0.3%
281. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Bloomberg, Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 0%
282. ^ Yang with 2%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Moulton, and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
283. ^ Castro with 2.5%; Yang with 1.3%; Klobuchar with 0.9%; Gabbard, Gillibrand and Ryan with 0.7%; de Blasio, Delaney, and Inslee with 0.6%; Hickenlooper with 0.4%; Bennet with 0.3%; Swalwell with 0.1%; Williamson with 0%; someone else with 0.2%
284. ^ Yang with 2%; Castro, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
285. ^ Inslee with 2%; Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Moulton, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Gabbard, Gravel, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 0%
286. ^ Yang with 1%; Gillibrand with 0.8%; Castro and Gabbard with 0.6%; Inslee with 0.5%; Hickenlooper with 0.4%; Bennet, Delaney, Klobuchar, Ryan and Swalwell with 0.2%; Williamson with 0.1%; de Blasio with 0%; someone else with 0.3%
287. ^ De Blasio, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
288. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Moulton, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
289. ^ Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 3%
290. ^ De Blasio, Gabbard, Inslee, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Ryan, and Williamson with 0%
291. ^ Yang with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
292. ^ Castro, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
293. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
294. ^ Yang with 2%; de Blasio, Gabbard, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Castro, Gillibrand, and Ryan with <1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Messam, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 0%
295. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Inslee, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 2%
296. ^ Castro with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Klobuchar, Messam, Ryan, and Swalwell with 1%; de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, Williamson, and Yang with 0%; others with 1%
297. ^ Bullock, Castro, Hickenlooper, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, Williamson with 0%; others with 0%
298. ^ Castro, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, and Moulton with <1%; de Blasio, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
299. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, and Ryan with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, and Swalwell with less than 0.5%; Williamson with 0%; others with <1%
300. ^ Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Inslee, Klobuchar, Swalwell, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, and Williamson with 0%
301. ^ Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; others with <1%
302. ^ Abrams, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
303. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; de Blasio, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
304. ^ De Blasio, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
305. ^ De Blasio with 2%; Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
306. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Castro and Yang with 1%; no other candidate with supporter greater than or equal to 0.5%
307. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Delaney, Castro, Klobuchar, Hickenlooper, and Moulton with 1%
308. ^ Bennet, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Yang with 0%; others with 1%
309. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Moulton and Swalwell with 0%; others with 2%
310. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; de Blasio, Delaney, Hickenlooper, and Williamson with <1%; Bullock, Messam, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 2%
311. ^ Bloomberg, Castro, Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
312. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; de Blasio, Inslee, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 2%
313. ^ Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Gabbard, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 0%
314. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gillibrand, Messam, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
315. ^ Abrams and Yang with 2%; de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
316. ^ Klobuchar with 3%; Castro, de Blasio, Gabbard, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Ryan with <1%; Bullock, Gravel, Messam, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 0%
317. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Castro, Gabbard, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; others with <1%
318. ^ Bennet, Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Inslee, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
319. ^ Castro, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Moulton, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
320. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 2%; Delaney, Gabbard, Inslee, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Messam, and Swalwell with less than 0.5%; Moulton with 0%; others with less than 0.5%
321. ^ Bennet, Castro, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
322. ^ Castro and Gillibrand with 2%; Bennet, Gabbard, Gravel, Klobuchar, Moulton, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
323. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Gabbard, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%
324. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Moulton, and Swalwell with 0%; others with 2%
325. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gillibrand, Gravel, Moulton, and Ryan with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
326. ^ Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, and Inslee with 1%; others with <1%
327. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, and Inslee with 0%; others with 1%
328. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Inslee and Moulton with 0%; others with 2%
329. ^ Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Ryan, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; Gravel, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Messam, and Moulton with 0%; others with 4%
330. ^ Bloomberg and Klobuchar with 2%; Delaney and Ryan with 1%; Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with 0%; others with 0%
331. ^ Castro, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; others with <1%
332. ^ Hickenlooper with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Klobuchar, Moulton, and Swalwell with 1%; Inslee, Messam, Ryan, Williamson, and Yang with 0%; others with 0%
333. ^ Gabbard and Klobuchar with 2%; Castro, Gillibrand, Inslee, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with 1%; de Blasio and Ryan with <1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Messam, and Moulton with 0%; others with <1%
334. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Ryan with 1%; Moulton with 0%; others with 2%
335. ^ Bullock, Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard, Inslee, Messam, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 6%
336. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 2%; Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and Ryan with 1%; Bullock and Delaney with 0%; others with 2%
337. ^ Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, and Klobuchar with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; others with 1%
338. ^ Abrams with 4%; Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Yang with 2%; Castro, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Swalwell with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, McAuliffe, Messam, and Williamson with 0%
339. ^ Klobuchar and Yang with 3%; Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 1%; Delaney and Messam with 0%
340. ^ Hickenlooper with 2%; de Blasio and Klobuchar with 1%; Castro, Gillibrand, Inslee, McAuliffe, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, Williamson, and Yang with <1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, Gabbard, and Ryan with 0%; others with 1%
341. ^ Hickenlooper and Klobuchar with 2%; de Blasio and Yang with 1%; Castro, Gillibrand, Inslee, McAuliffe, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with <1%; Bennet, Bullock, Delaney, and Gabbard with 0%; others with 1%
342. ^ Hickenlooper with 2%; Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Yang with 1%; Delaney and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
343. ^ Castro and Yang with 3%; Delaney, Gabbard, Gravel, Klobuchar, Ryan, and Swalwell with 1%; Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, and Williamson with 0%; others with 2%
344. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; McAuliffe with 0%; others with 3%
345. ^ Klobuchar with 3%; Gillibrand, Ryan, and Yang with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, and McAuliffe with 1%; others with 3%
346. ^ Gillibrand and Klobuchar with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, and Yang with 1%; McAuliffe with 0%; others with 2%
347. ^ Gillibrand and Klobuchar with 2%; Castro and Yang with 1%; Delaney and Gabbard with 0%; others with 8%
348. ^ Castro, Delaney, Gillibrand, Williamson and Yang with 1%; Gabbard, Hickenlooper and Inslee with 0%; others with 1%
349. ^ ^{a b} Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Inslee with 1%; McAuliffe with 0%; others with 3%
350. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Avenatti, Bloomberg, Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee and Yang with 1%; others with 0%
351. ^ Castro and Hickenlooper with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Williamson and Yang with <1%; others with 1%
352. ^ Gillibrand with 2%; Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Inslee and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Gabbard, McAuliffe and Swalwell with <1%; Hickenlooper with 0%; others with 1%
353. ^ Castro, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, Inslee and Yang with 1%; Gillibrand with 0%; others with 5%
354. ^ Kerry with 4%; Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Inslee with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard, and McAuliffe with <1%; Bullock with 0%; others with 2%
355. ^ Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Inslee with 1%; Bullock and McAuliffe with 0%; others with 3%
356. ^ Inslee with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Yang with 1%; Bullock, Cuomo, de Blasio, Delaney, McAuliffe, Moulton, Swalwell and Williamson with 0%
357. ^ Castro, Inslee and Yang with 2%; Gabbard, Gillibrand and Hickenlooper with 1%; Delaney and Williamson with 0%
358. ^ Delaney with 2%; Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee and Yang with 1%; Gabbard and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
359. ^ Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee and McAuliffe with 1%; others with 3%
360. ^ Bloomberg and Brown, Castro, de Blasio, Hickenlooper and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Holder, Inslee, McAuliffe and Williamson with <1%; Bullock and Delaney with 0%; others with <1%
361. ^ Bloomberg and Brown with 2%; Castro, de Blasio, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Yang with 1%; Bennet, Gabbard, Holder, Inslee, McAuliffe and Williamson with <1%; Bullock and Delaney with 0%; others with <1%
362. ^ Brown, Castro and Gabbard with 1%; Delaney and Gillibrand with 0%; others with 1%
363. ^ Bloomberg with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper and Holder with 1%; Delaney, Inslee and McAuliffe with 0%; others with 3%
364. ^ Brown, Bullock, Buttigieg, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder and McAuliffe with 1%; Inslee with 0%; others with 3%
365. ^ Castro with 2%; Gabbard and Gillibrand with 1%; Avenatti with 0%; others with 1%
366. ^ Brown, Bullock, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and McAuliffe with 1%; Buttigieg, Delaney, and Inslee with 0%; others with 3%
367. ^ Brown with 3%; Gabbard with 2%; Castro and Gillibrand with 1%; Buttigieg and Delaney with 0%; others with 6%
368. ^ Abrams with 5%; Gillibrand with 3%; Brown with 1%; Castro with <1%
369. ^ Brown with 2%; Bullock, Castro, Gillibrand, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, and Holder with 1%; Buttigieg, Delaney, Inslee, and McAuliffe with 0%; others with 3%
370. ^ Castro with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and McAuliffe with 1%; Buttigieg, Delaney, and Inslee with 0%
371. ^ Brown with 2%; Gabbard, Hickenlooper, and Kerry with 1%; Bullock, Buttigieg, Castro, Delaney, Garcetti, Gillibrand, Holder, Inslee, McAuliffe, and Newsom with 0%; others with 2%
372. ^ Brown, Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and Yang with 1%; Delaney, Inslee, and McAuliffe with <1%; Buttigieg with 0%; others with 1%
373. ^ Brown, Bullock, Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and Kerry with 1%; Buttigieg, Delaney, Gabbard, Garcetti, Inslee, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%; others with 3%
374. ^ Castro and Gillibrand with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Hickenlooper, Holder, and McAuliffe with 1%; Delaney, Gabbard, and Inslee with 0%
375. ^ Castro and Gillibrand with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, and Kerry with 1%; Delaney, Garcetti, Holder, Inslee, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%; others with 2%
376. ^ Castro with 8%; Brown with 4%; Delaney and Gabbard with 2%; Gillibrand and Ojeda with 1%; others with 6%
377. ^ Castro with 12%; Gillibrand with 9%; Delaney with 8%; Ojeda with 7%; Gabbard with 3%
378. ^ Brown and Gillibrand with 2%; Delaney with 1%; Castro, Gabbard, and McAuliffe with 0%
379. ^ Castro and Gillibrand with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Hickenlooper, Holder, and McAuliffe with 1%; Delaney and Inslee with 0%
380. ^ Gabbard and Gillibrand with 2%; Castro with 1%; Avenatti with 0%; others with 3%
381. ^ Brown, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and Kerry with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Garcetti, Inslee, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%; others with 3%
382. ^ Castro with 2%; Brown, Bullock, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, and McAuliffe with 1%; Delaney and Inslee with 0%
383. ^ Kerry with 4%; Klobuchar with 3%; Brown, Bullock, Gillibrand, Holder, Inslee, and McAuliffe with 1%; Castro, Garcetti, and Hickenlooper with <1%; Delaney and Steyer with 0%; others with 2%
384. ^ Brown with 7%; others with 15%
385. ^ Avenatti with 2%; others with 2%
386. ^ Brown, Bullock, Castro, Cuomo, Garcetti, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Newsom, and Schultz with 1%; Avenatti, Delaney, Holder, and Patrick with 0%; others with 3%
387. ^ Kerry with 5%; Holder with 3%; Garcetti with 2%; Avenatti, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, and Patrick with 1%; Bullock and Delaney with <1%; others with 2%
388. ^ Brown and Holder with 2%; Delaney, McAuliffe, and Patrick with 1%
389. ^ “A governor, like Terry McAuliffe of Virginia, Steve Bullock of Montana or John Hickenlooper of Colorado” and Schultz with 2%; Steyer and Landrieu with 1%; others with 2%
390. ^ Holder and McAuliffe with 1%; Brown and Patrick with 0%
391. ^ Holder with 6%; Bullock and Landrieu with 3%; Brown and Murphy with 1%; McAuliffe and Patrick with 0%; others with 1%
392. ^ Brown, Holder, and Patrick with 1%; McAuliffe with 0%
393. ^ Steyer with 1%; others with 8%
394. ^ Kander with 4%; Klobuchar with 2%; others with 9%
395. ^ “A woman senator like Kamala Harris or Kirsten Gillibrand” with 5%; “Moderate Governors John Hickenlooper or Terry McAuliffe” and “A cultural figure like Tom Hanks or Dwayne ‘the Rock’ Johnson” with 2%; “A businessman like Tom Steyer or Howard Schultz”, “A young lawmaker like Chris Murphy or Julian Castro”, and “A mayor of a major city like Bill DeBlasio or Antonio Villaraigosa” with 1%; others with 0%
396. ^ Zuckerberg with 7%; Klobuchar and McAuliffe with 1%
397. ^ Cuban with 7%; Klobuchar with 1%
398. ^ Franken with 3%; Brown with 2%; Castro with 0%
399. ^ Buttigieg with 5%; Yang with 4%; Bennet and Steyer with 3%; Castro and Klobuchar with 2%; Delaney and Gabbard with 1%; Patrick and Williamson with 0%
400. ^ Not listed separately from “someone else”
401. ^ Buttigieg with 8%; Steyer and Yang with 3%; Gabbard and Klobuchar with 2%; someone else with 3%
402. ^ Buttigieg and Kerry with 5%; Klobuchar, Steyer and Yang with 2%; Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, and Gravel with 1%; Gillibrand, Messam, Swalwell and Williamson with 0%; other with 1%; will not vote with 0%
403. ^ Kerry with 8%; Buttigieg and Yang with 2%; Klobuchar and Steyer with 1%; Castro, Gabbard, Gravel, Messam, Swalwell and Williamson with 0%; Delaney with no voters; not planning on voting with 2%; other with 0%
404. ^ Other with 30%
405. ^ Other with 8%
406. ^ If Biden were not in the race
407. ^ Yang with 6%; Buttigieg with 5%; Bennet, Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer with 2%; Delaney and Ryan with 1%; Bullock, Castro and Messam with 0%; Williamson with no voters
408. ^ Buttigieg with 4%; Yang with 2%; Delaney, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%; others with 1%
409. ^ Buttigieg with 5%; Klobuchar and Trump with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Hickenlooper, Barack Obama, Schultz, and Yang with <1%; others with 4%
410. ^ Buttigieg and Yang with 2%; Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Avenatti, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, and Inslee with 0%; others with 0%
411. ^ Buttigieg with 3%; Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, and Williamson with 1%; Castro, Cuomo, de Blasio, Gabbard, Inslee, McAuliffe and Yang with 0%
412. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Delaney and Gabbard with 1%; Buttigieg, Castro, and Gillibrand with 0%; others with 1%
413. ^ Avenatti, Castro, Gabbard, and Gillibrand with 0%; others with 1%
414. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Brown with 1%; others with 4%
415. ^ Brown, Castro, Cuomo, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Patrick, and Zuckerberg with 1%; Buttigieg, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Holder, Inslee, Kaine, McAuliffe, and Yang with 0%
416. ^ Trump with 4%; Bullock, Klobuchar, and Pelosi with 1%; Brown, Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Johnson, Kennedy, Kucinich, Lee, Scott, Sinema, and Warner with <1%; others with 4%
417. ^ Brown with 2%; Castro, Delaney, and Gillibrand with 1%; Gabbard and McAuliffe with 0%
418. ^ Castro with 2%; Gabbard and Gillibrand with 1%; Avenatti with 0%; others with 2%
419. ^ Kerry and Klobuchar with 2%; Brown, Gillibrand, and Inslee with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Cuomo, Delaney, Garcetti, Hickenlooper, Holder, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%; others with 2%
420. ^ Kennedy with 5%; Klobuchar with 3%; Brown and Castro with 2%; Cuomo, Gillibrand, Holder, Kerry, Steyer, and Swalwell with 1%; Delaney, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%
421. ^ Kerry with 2%; Brown, Castro, Cuomo, Garcetti, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, Klobuchar, and Newsom with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, McAuliffe, and Schultz with 0%; others with 3%
422. ^ Brown with 2%; Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Holder, Klobuchar, and Patrick with 1%; de Blasio, Kaine, Schultz, and Zuckerberg with 0%
423. ^ Avenatti with 1%; others with 4%
424. ^ Kennedy with 8%
425. ^ Cuomo with 1%; Gillibrand with 1%; others with 12%
426. ^ Cuomo with 2%; Gillibrand with 1% others with 10%
427. ^ Gillibrand with 2%; Klobuchar with 1%; others with 4%
428. ^ Zuckerberg with 4%; Cuomo and McAuliffe with 2%; Gillibrand and Klobuchar with 1%
429. ^ Percentages calculated as original percentage/97%, given that 3% of voters said they’d back neither candidate
430. ^ Percentages calculated as original percentage/95%, given that 5% of voters said they’d back neither candidate
431. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i} Includes all who did not express for one of the top two candidates
432. ^ But for the first three results listed, ‘undecided’ voters are not included in the listed percentages.
433. ^ Net favourability calculated as (proportion that feel positive about the candidate – proportion that does not feel positive about the candidate)
434. ^ Net favourability calculated as approval voting total
435. ^ Calculated using net favourability amongst Democratic registered voters who know the candidate * % of Democratic registered voters who know the candidate, to 2 decimal places
436. ^ Net favourability calculated as (net favourability among exclusively Dem. primary voters * proportion of Dem. primary voters that are exclusively Dem. primary voters) + (net favourability among voters in both Dem. and Rep. primaries * proportion of Dem. primary voters that are voters in both Dem. and Rep. primaries). Net favourability for a single category calculated as (% of category which rates candidate > 0 – % of category which rates candidate < 0).
437. ^ This poll’s favourability ratings were the first to be calculated using the “Democratic Primary Voter” subsample. All YouGov/Economist polls’ favourability ratings before this date are calculated with the “Democratic Party member” subsample.
438. ^ This poll’s favourability ratings were the last to be calculated using the “Democratic Party member” subsample. All YouGov/Economist polls’ favourability ratings after this date are calculated with the “Democratic Primary Voter” subsample.

1. ^ ^{a b c d} ‘Likely voters’ here combines the ‘likely voter’ and ‘definite voter’ categories in the linked poll.

References

1. ^ “DNC Announces Details For The First Two Presidential Primary Debates”. Democratic National Committee. February 14, 2019. Retrieved March 9, 2019.
2. ^ Montellaro, Zach (June 6, 2019). “Who’s in — and out — of the first Democratic debates”. Retrieved June 7, 2019.
3. ^ Skelley, Geoffrey (September 9, 2019). “Who will make the fourth Democratic debate?”. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
4. ^ Verhovek, John (May 29, 2019). “ABC News to host 3rd Democratic primary debate in September as DNC announces higher qualifying threshold”. ABC News. Retrieved May 29, 2019.

External links

• Latest 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Polls at RealClearPoitics
• Primary poll tracker from FiveThirtyEight
• Morning Consult weekly Democratic primary tracking poll